Morphology‐Induced Thermal Refuge in a Gravel‐Bed River

ABSTRACT Climate change is increasingly impacting stream temperature, a primary control on the biological, geochemical and ecological processes in fluvial systems. In response, river restoration is focusing on river temperature regimes and creating instream thermal refuge during peak summer temperatures. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of various constructed morphologic features (e.g., pools, riffles, alcoves, plane beds and spring‐fed side channels) designed to generate thermal refuge during summer low‐flow conditions in a recently restored gravel‐bed river. To assess this, we monitored the groundwater table, river water surface elevation, the direction and magnitude of hyporheic fluxes and the spatial distribution of near‐bed water temperatures. River‐groundwater differentials, quantified as the difference in elevation between the surface water elevation in the river and the groundwater table, were the primary factors controlling hydrologic gaining and losing patterns in the channel. In contrast, flow‐bedform interactions generated by individual morphologic features induced comparatively limited hyporheic exchange, with average hyporheic fluxes constituting ~0.25% of the instream summer discharge. While the magnitude of hyporheic fluxes was relatively similar across individual morphologic features, pools contained the most thermal refuge and longitudinally cooled water temperatures by an average of 1.26°C/100 m. In contrast, riffle and plane bed features generated little observed thermal refuge and increased temperatures on average by 1.43°C/100 m and 0.81°C/100 m, respectively. Spring channels provided cool water temperatures at their upstream ends, but the slow, shallow flows rapidly warmed (3.7°C/100 m) before entering the main river channel due to lack of riparian shade. Alcove temperatures were similarly influenced by depth and riparian shading. Deep, well‐shaded alcoves provided cool‐water habitat, whereas shallow, unshaded features maintained high temperatures. Results outline the role of channel morphology in generating thermal refuge that may be used to better understand aquatic habitat and guide future restoration projects in gravel‐bed rivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70107
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morphology‐Induced Thermal Refuge in a Gravel‐Bed River

A. A. Hurst, Andrew W. Tranmer, John C. Frye, Andrea Bertagnoli et al.
2 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
3.43
article

Morphology‐Induced Thermal Refuge in a Gravel‐Bed River

A. A. Hurst, Andrew W. Tranmer, John C. Frye, Andrea Bertagnoli, Caroline Ubing, Joel Sholtes, Daniele Tonina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Climate change is increasingly impacting stream temperature, a primary control on the biological, geochemical and ecological processes in fluvial systems. In response, river restoration is focusing on river temperature regimes and creating instream thermal refuge during peak summer temperatures. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of various constructed morphologic features (e.g., pools, riffles, alcoves, plane beds and spring‐fed side channels) designed to generate thermal refuge during summer low‐flow conditions in a recently restored gravel‐bed river. To assess this, we monitored the groundwater table, river water surface elevation, the direction and magnitude of hyporheic fluxes and the spatial distribution of near‐bed water temperatures. River‐groundwater differentials, quantified as the difference in elevation between the surface water elevation in the river and the groundwater table, were the primary factors controlling hydrologic gaining and losing patterns in the channel. In contrast, flow‐bedform interactions generated by individual morphologic features induced comparatively limited hyporheic exchange, with average hyporheic fluxes constituting ~0.25% of the instream summer discharge. While the magnitude of hyporheic fluxes was relatively similar across individual morphologic features, pools contained the most thermal refuge and longitudinally cooled water temperatures by an average of 1.26°C/100 m. In contrast, riffle and plane bed features generated little observed thermal refuge and increased temperatures on average by 1.43°C/100 m and 0.81°C/100 m, respectively. Spring channels provided cool water temperatures at their upstream ends, but the slow, shallow flows rapidly warmed (3.7°C/100 m) before entering the main river channel due to lack of riparian shade. Alcove temperatures were similarly influenced by depth and riparian shading. Deep, well‐shaded alcoves provided cool‐water habitat, whereas shallow, unshaded features maintained high temperatures. Results outline the role of channel morphology in generating thermal refuge that may be used to better understand aquatic habitat and guide future restoration projects in gravel‐bed rivers.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(4)
United States Bureau of Reclamation (US), Colorado Mesa University (US), University of Idaho (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust, Bureau of Reclamation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.