Rationale for Imaging Referral Guidelines in Rectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Rectal carcinoma is an important cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with an increasing incidence among young patients. Rectal cancers differ anatomically from other colonic cancers due to their proximity to critical pelvic structures like the anal sphincters and urinary bladder. Advances in surgical techniques (total mesorectal excision) and the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have improved survival, reduced recurrence, and significantly reduced postoperative incontinence in these patients. Imaging is crucial for preoperative staging and prognostication, defining surgical planes, planning and assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy, and long-term surveillance. High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance is considered the workhorse for evaluating rectal carcinoma malignancies. As a result, the radiologist is a vital part of the multidisciplinary team comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists in managing rectal cancer. This review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into the imaging recommendations for rectal cancer evaluation at different time points of the management algorithm of rectal carcinoma and the rationale behind them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1807244
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rationale for Imaging Referral Guidelines in Rectal Cancer Patients

Raju Sharma, Ankur Goyal, Sanchita Gupta
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Rationale for Imaging Referral Guidelines in Rectal Cancer Patients

Raju Sharma, Ankur Goyal, Sanchita Gupta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rectal carcinoma is an important cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with an increasing incidence among young patients. Rectal cancers differ anatomically from other colonic cancers due to their proximity to critical pelvic structures like the anal sphincters and urinary bladder. Advances in surgical techniques (total mesorectal excision) and the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have improved survival, reduced recurrence, and significantly reduced postoperative incontinence in these patients. Imaging is crucial for preoperative staging and prognostication, defining surgical planes, planning and assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy, and long-term surveillance. High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance is considered the workhorse for evaluating rectal carcinoma malignancies. As a result, the radiologist is a vital part of the multidisciplinary team comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists in managing rectal cancer. This review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into the imaging recommendations for rectal cancer evaluation at different time points of the management algorithm of rectal carcinoma and the rationale behind them.

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal RadiologyVol. 08(01)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.