Determinants of collective action by farm producers: A meta-analysis of the likelihood of co-operative membership

Collectively owned and controlled by farm producers, co-operatives have been prominent and successful in many countries. The empirical literature on co-operatives is extensive, part of which considers the various determinants of co-operative membership. However, the evidence is mixed and scattered, which warrants a meta-analysis to help inform market and policy initiatives to increase the incidence of collective action by farm producers. Our search yielded 168 studies, 213 model results, and 924 effect size estimates for the ten most common determinants: gender, age, experience, education, household size, farm size, herd size , off-farm income, credit access, and market distance. On the basis of random-effects model results, eight of the ten determinants (excluding off-farm income and market distance) have a positive and significant effect on the likelihood of co-operative membership at the 99 % confidence level. Thus, farm producers who are small, female, young, inexperienced, uneducated, or credit-constrained are less likely to obtain co-operative membership. However, the effect size magnitudes are arguably small; effect size dispersions are not explained significantly by common study-level characteristics such as location (i.e. continent) or commodity sector (e.g. coffee). Information of local contexts is necessary to better understand heterogeneity in effect size observations. • The study meta-analyses 168 studies and 924 effect size estimates of ten determinants of co-operative membership. • Gender, age, experience, education, size (family, farm, herd), credit access significantly impact co-operative membership. • Study-level characteristics do not significantly explain effect size variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103639
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of collective action by farm producers: A meta-analysis of the likelihood of co-operative membership

Jasper Grashuis
3 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Cooperative Studies and Economics
6.68
article

Determinants of collective action by farm producers: A meta-analysis of the likelihood of co-operative membership

Jasper Grashuis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Collectively owned and controlled by farm producers, co-operatives have been prominent and successful in many countries. The empirical literature on co-operatives is extensive, part of which considers the various determinants of co-operative membership. However, the evidence is mixed and scattered, which warrants a meta-analysis to help inform market and policy initiatives to increase the incidence of collective action by farm producers. Our search yielded 168 studies, 213 model results, and 924 effect size estimates for the ten most common determinants: gender, age, experience, education, household size, farm size, herd size , off-farm income, credit access, and market distance. On the basis of random-effects model results, eight of the ten determinants (excluding off-farm income and market distance) have a positive and significant effect on the likelihood of co-operative membership at the 99 % confidence level. Thus, farm producers who are small, female, young, inexperienced, uneducated, or credit-constrained are less likely to obtain co-operative membership. However, the effect size magnitudes are arguably small; effect size dispersions are not explained significantly by common study-level characteristics such as location (i.e. continent) or commodity sector (e.g. coffee). Information of local contexts is necessary to better understand heterogeneity in effect size observations. • The study meta-analyses 168 studies and 924 effect size estimates of ten determinants of co-operative membership. • Gender, age, experience, education, size (family, farm, herd), credit access significantly impact co-operative membership. • Study-level characteristics do not significantly explain effect size variability.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 117
University of Missouri (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.