Understanding Flow Transport in Dual‐Water‐Source Rivers: Enhancing Storage Selection Functions With Two‐Gamma Distributions

ABSTRACT Modelling solute transport in river systems using the Storage Selection (SAS) function presents challenges when solute recharge originates from two distinct water sources: a point reclaimed‐water source (perpendicular to gravity) and a surface rainfall source (parallel to gravity). This study introduces three modifications to the original SAS function to address dual‐source transport dynamics in a reclaimed‐water‐source river reach: (i) incorporating rainwater into the reclaimed water flux ( R ), (ii) introducing a mixing process to represent interactions between rainwater and reclaimed water (Mix), and (iii) modifying the original SAS function into a two‐gamma‐distribution (2GM) model to better capture dual‐source transport behaviour. The effects of these modifications were evaluated individually and in combination. Among the modifications, the 2GM model achieved the highest increase in the Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), followed by R and then Mix. The 2GM model regulated storage volume, thereby influencing the outflow δ 2 H value (i.e., the objective function), making it the most effective modification. Combining all modifications produced the best model performance, improving NSE from 0.61 to 0.86. However, short‐term δ 2 H fluctuations due to river morphology‐induced stochastic processes were not captured by this lumped transport model. The optimal model indicated that storm events significantly accelerated river water (mixed reclaimed water and rainwater) mobility. One day after rainfall, 53% of the water at the outlet originated from event water, either from adjacent sites or nearby subsurface flow. Subsequent rainwater and reclaimed water flowed out gradually at a very slow rate. River storage received sustained event water throughout the wet period, with most event water stagnating in storage, except for outflow occurring 1 day post‐rainfall. Special attention should be given to pollutants carried by event water and the associated aquatic risks during wet periods in megacities. This study provides a reference for flood management and pollution control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70121
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Flow Transport in Dual‐Water‐Source Rivers: Enhancing Storage Selection Functions With Two‐Gamma Distributions

Shengtian Yang, Tiantian Zhou, Dongmei Han, Anran Liao et al.
3 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
article

Understanding Flow Transport in Dual‐Water‐Source Rivers: Enhancing Storage Selection Functions With Two‐Gamma Distributions

Shengtian Yang, Tiantian Zhou, Dongmei Han, Anran Liao, Xianfang Song, Lihu Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Modelling solute transport in river systems using the Storage Selection (SAS) function presents challenges when solute recharge originates from two distinct water sources: a point reclaimed‐water source (perpendicular to gravity) and a surface rainfall source (parallel to gravity). This study introduces three modifications to the original SAS function to address dual‐source transport dynamics in a reclaimed‐water‐source river reach: (i) incorporating rainwater into the reclaimed water flux ( R ), (ii) introducing a mixing process to represent interactions between rainwater and reclaimed water (Mix), and (iii) modifying the original SAS function into a two‐gamma‐distribution (2GM) model to better capture dual‐source transport behaviour. The effects of these modifications were evaluated individually and in combination. Among the modifications, the 2GM model achieved the highest increase in the Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), followed by R and then Mix. The 2GM model regulated storage volume, thereby influencing the outflow δ 2 H value (i.e., the objective function), making it the most effective modification. Combining all modifications produced the best model performance, improving NSE from 0.61 to 0.86. However, short‐term δ 2 H fluctuations due to river morphology‐induced stochastic processes were not captured by this lumped transport model. The optimal model indicated that storm events significantly accelerated river water (mixed reclaimed water and rainwater) mobility. One day after rainfall, 53% of the water at the outlet originated from event water, either from adjacent sites or nearby subsurface flow. Subsequent rainwater and reclaimed water flowed out gradually at a very slow rate. River storage received sustained event water throughout the wet period, with most event water stagnating in storage, except for outflow occurring 1 day post‐rainfall. Special attention should be given to pollutants carried by event water and the associated aquatic risks during wet periods in megacities. This study provides a reference for flood management and pollution control.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(4)
University of Arizona (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of California, Davis (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.