“I’m Sorry” vs. “My Bad”: A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Analysis of Apology Strategies in British and American English

The manner in which people apologize differs widely among different cultures because these differences stem from societal pragmatic standards. The research investigates pragmatic differences within British and American English speaking populations regarding their apology expressions through analysis of "I'm sorry" and "My bad." The research analyzes apology expressions through Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of Politeness and Leech’s (2014) Politeness principles within various social environments. A quantitative design was selected to gauge confirming 200 participants from Britain and America through questionnaire surveys with additional corpus investigation of 100,000-word British National Corpus and Corpus of Contemporary American English collections. The research used descriptive statistics analysis together with chi-square inferential tests and t-tests and corpus linguistic analysis to identify frequency counts and contextual patterns and perceptions of politeness. Research evidence shows British subjects prefer "I'm sorry" across all social circumstances yet American subjects prefer "My bad" when speaking informally. The research demonstrates how globalization together with media contact influences the development of apology methods. The educational system should establish a focus on developing multicultural pragmatic sensitivity for language learners. Future investigation needs to enlarge the current research by analyzing how geographical dialects influence apology expressions as well as studying the effects of digital communication on them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/k1a6zz88
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I’m Sorry” vs. “My Bad”: A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Analysis of Apology Strategies in British and American English

Ali Nawaz, Qamar Abbas, Muhammad Ashraf Kaloi
1 citations
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
article

“I’m Sorry” vs. “My Bad”: A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Analysis of Apology Strategies in British and American English

Ali Nawaz, Qamar Abbas, Muhammad Ashraf Kaloi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The manner in which people apologize differs widely among different cultures because these differences stem from societal pragmatic standards. The research investigates pragmatic differences within British and American English speaking populations regarding their apology expressions through analysis of "I'm sorry" and "My bad." The research analyzes apology expressions through Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of Politeness and Leech’s (2014) Politeness principles within various social environments. A quantitative design was selected to gauge confirming 200 participants from Britain and America through questionnaire surveys with additional corpus investigation of 100,000-word British National Corpus and Corpus of Contemporary American English collections. The research used descriptive statistics analysis together with chi-square inferential tests and t-tests and corpus linguistic analysis to identify frequency counts and contextual patterns and perceptions of politeness. Research evidence shows British subjects prefer "I'm sorry" across all social circumstances yet American subjects prefer "My bad" when speaking informally. The research demonstrates how globalization together with media contact influences the development of apology methods. The educational system should establish a focus on developing multicultural pragmatic sensitivity for language learners. Future investigation needs to enlarge the current research by analyzing how geographical dialects influence apology expressions as well as studying the effects of digital communication on them.

˜The œcritical review of social sciences studiesVol. 3(1)
University of Sindh (PK), Institute of Linguistics (CN), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I’m Sorry” vs. “My Bad”: A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Analysis of Apology Strategies in British and American English — Ali Nawaz, Qamar Abbas, et al. · ˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS