The Observed Isotopic Errors in Extreme Precipitation Leads to Overestimation of Long‐Term Soil‐Streamflow Hydrological Connectivity

ABSTRACT The tracer‐aided modelling has gained widespread attention in recent years as a crucial approach for investigating watershed hydrological functions. However, errors in model inputs, such as precipitation, evapotranspiration (ET) and isotopes in precipitation, can lead to uncertainty in physically meaningful model parameters, which, in turn, affects the accurate depiction of watershed hydrological functions. In this study, we focused on the Hemuqiao watershed, a typical humid mountainous region in southeast China, equipped with intensive isotopic and hydrological monitoring. The Two Reservoirs StorAge Selection (TRSAS) model was adopted to explore the impact of input data in understanding watershed hydrological connectivity and preferential flow. The results show that observation errors in precipitation and ET data do not significantly reduce model performance (with the optimal NSE value decreasing by up to 0.05). However, they do increase the uncertainty of simulation parameters, primarily due to errors associated with large precipitation and evapotranspiration events. In contrast, observed isotopic errors in precipitation, particularly during extreme precipitation events, reduce model performance and meanwhile lead to significant differences in some simulation parameters compared to no error data. Although the proportion of young water fraction in the streamflow does not show a noticeable difference, the proportions of lateral subsurface flow and young water fraction in lateral subsurface flow tend to be overestimated (i.e., by approximately 0.14 and 0.08, respectively, on average over the long term). This results in an overestimation of lateral preferential flow and hydrological connectivity between soil and streamflow. These findings suggest that in tracer‐aided models, improving the observation accuracy of isotopes in extreme precipitation is more critical for accurately understanding watershed hydrological processes than enhancing spatial observations of precipitation and ET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70116
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Observed Isotopic Errors in Extreme Precipitation Leads to Overestimation of Long‐Term Soil‐Streamflow Hydrological Connectivity

Simin Qu, Chong Wei, Hai Yang, Xiaoqiang Yang et al.
1 citations
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

The Observed Isotopic Errors in Extreme Precipitation Leads to Overestimation of Long‐Term Soil‐Streamflow Hydrological Connectivity

Simin Qu, Chong Wei, Hai Yang, Xiaoqiang Yang, Jianfeng Gou, Jintao Liu, Xueliang Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The tracer‐aided modelling has gained widespread attention in recent years as a crucial approach for investigating watershed hydrological functions. However, errors in model inputs, such as precipitation, evapotranspiration (ET) and isotopes in precipitation, can lead to uncertainty in physically meaningful model parameters, which, in turn, affects the accurate depiction of watershed hydrological functions. In this study, we focused on the Hemuqiao watershed, a typical humid mountainous region in southeast China, equipped with intensive isotopic and hydrological monitoring. The Two Reservoirs StorAge Selection (TRSAS) model was adopted to explore the impact of input data in understanding watershed hydrological connectivity and preferential flow. The results show that observation errors in precipitation and ET data do not significantly reduce model performance (with the optimal NSE value decreasing by up to 0.05). However, they do increase the uncertainty of simulation parameters, primarily due to errors associated with large precipitation and evapotranspiration events. In contrast, observed isotopic errors in precipitation, particularly during extreme precipitation events, reduce model performance and meanwhile lead to significant differences in some simulation parameters compared to no error data. Although the proportion of young water fraction in the streamflow does not show a noticeable difference, the proportions of lateral subsurface flow and young water fraction in lateral subsurface flow tend to be overestimated (i.e., by approximately 0.14 and 0.08, respectively, on average over the long term). This results in an overestimation of lateral preferential flow and hydrological connectivity between soil and streamflow. These findings suggest that in tracer‐aided models, improving the observation accuracy of isotopes in extreme precipitation is more critical for accurately understanding watershed hydrological processes than enhancing spatial observations of precipitation and ET.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(4)
China Three Gorges University (CN), Hohai University (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), Huaiyin Institute of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Geological Survey, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.