Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy: Long-term results

• Mechanical tissue removal systems and bipolar resection are both effective for endometrial polyp removal. • Abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence rates show no significant difference between the two methods. • Further research is needed on cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of both procedures. • Hormonal status and comorbidities may predict recurrence and symptom persistence after hysteroscopic polypectomy. This study aims to compare long-term outcomes, including recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence, following hysteroscopic polypectomy using either a mechanical tissue removal system or bipolar resection. This is a multicentre follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial comparing a tissue removal system with bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy. The study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (The Netherlands). The trial was approved by the ethical committees of both centres and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05337046 , April 2022). Thirty-eight patients (49.4%) were willing to participate in this follow-up study, with 19 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was abnormal uterine bleeding recurrence after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included polyp recurrence, symptom relief, patient-reported satisfaction, and need for additional treatments. Mean follow-up time was over nine years in both groups. The recurrence rate of abnormal uterine bleeding was 25% in the tissue removal system group and 40% in the bipolar resection group ( p = .65), with a mean time to recurrence of 8.6 years (95% CI, 6.5–10.7 years) in the tissue removal system group and 8.1 years (95% CI, 5.8–10.5 years) in the bipolar resection group ( p = .57). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in time to polyp recurrence ( p = .93) or symptom relief between the two groups ( p = .62). This long-term follow-up study found no significant difference in the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a tissue removal system and bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100114
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy: Long-term results

Basiel Weyers, Tjalina Hamerlynck, Steven Weyers, Steffi van Wessel et al.
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

Tissue removal system versus bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy: Long-term results

Basiel Weyers, Tjalina Hamerlynck, Steven Weyers, Steffi van Wessel, Margot Van Geyte, Alejandra de Frenne, Huib van Vliet
article en

Abstract

• Mechanical tissue removal systems and bipolar resection are both effective for endometrial polyp removal. • Abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence rates show no significant difference between the two methods. • Further research is needed on cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of both procedures. • Hormonal status and comorbidities may predict recurrence and symptom persistence after hysteroscopic polypectomy. This study aims to compare long-term outcomes, including recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding and polyp recurrence, following hysteroscopic polypectomy using either a mechanical tissue removal system or bipolar resection. This is a multicentre follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial comparing a tissue removal system with bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy. The study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (The Netherlands). The trial was approved by the ethical committees of both centres and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT05337046 , April 2022). Thirty-eight patients (49.4%) were willing to participate in this follow-up study, with 19 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was abnormal uterine bleeding recurrence after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included polyp recurrence, symptom relief, patient-reported satisfaction, and need for additional treatments. Mean follow-up time was over nine years in both groups. The recurrence rate of abnormal uterine bleeding was 25% in the tissue removal system group and 40% in the bipolar resection group ( p = .65), with a mean time to recurrence of 8.6 years (95% CI, 6.5–10.7 years) in the tissue removal system group and 8.1 years (95% CI, 5.8–10.5 years) in the bipolar resection group ( p = .57). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in time to polyp recurrence ( p = .93) or symptom relief between the two groups ( p = .62). This long-term follow-up study found no significant difference in the recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding between a tissue removal system and bipolar resection for hysteroscopic polypectomy.

Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine DisordersVol. 10
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.