Examining the Culture of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Within the Video Game Industry Through an Anti-Isms Lens

Esports and gaming have been conceptualized as a merging of technology and traditional sport, both of which are industries with histories of exclusionary and discriminatory cultures. Further, it has been established that within both sport and technology organizations, the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have largely been based upon mandated federal policy compliance rather than cultural change. Thus, the purpose of this study was to illuminate current DEI efforts and practices within gaming and esports organizations through an anti-isms lens and to explore the perceived effectiveness of these efforts in establishing increased inclusivity and decreased marginalization. The study employed an exploratory, qualitative approach. Participants ( n = 6) were currently employed by either a gaming or esports-specific organization working specifically on DEI initiatives. Findings revealed four themes describing the current culture of DEI efforts including: (1) performative DEI, (2) limited impacts, (3) benevolent equity, and (4) inequitable burdens. Overall, the findings revealed highly surface level and reactive processes that fail to effectively shift the culture of gaming and esports organizations toward truly inclusive and equitable environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jege.2024-0021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Games and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Culture of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Within the Video Game Industry Through an Anti-Isms Lens

Lindsey Darvin, Ajhanai C.I. Keaton, Jeffrey Levine
2 citations
Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports
Digital Games and Media
8.40
article

Examining the Culture of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Within the Video Game Industry Through an Anti-Isms Lens

Lindsey Darvin, Ajhanai C.I. Keaton, Jeffrey Levine
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Esports and gaming have been conceptualized as a merging of technology and traditional sport, both of which are industries with histories of exclusionary and discriminatory cultures. Further, it has been established that within both sport and technology organizations, the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have largely been based upon mandated federal policy compliance rather than cultural change. Thus, the purpose of this study was to illuminate current DEI efforts and practices within gaming and esports organizations through an anti-isms lens and to explore the perceived effectiveness of these efforts in establishing increased inclusivity and decreased marginalization. The study employed an exploratory, qualitative approach. Participants ( n = 6) were currently employed by either a gaming or esports-specific organization working specifically on DEI initiatives. Findings revealed four themes describing the current culture of DEI efforts including: (1) performative DEI, (2) limited impacts, (3) benevolent equity, and (4) inequitable burdens. Overall, the findings revealed highly surface level and reactive processes that fail to effectively shift the culture of gaming and esports organizations toward truly inclusive and equitable environments.

Journal of Electronic Gaming and EsportsVol. 3(1)
University of Louisville (US), Syracuse University (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Games and Media
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.