Can Ground Reaction Force Variables Preidentify the Probability of a Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Distance Runners?

The incidence of lower extremity injuries in collegiate distance runners is ∼20%. Identification of a runner sustaining a potential injury remains challenging. This exploratory, cross-institutional study sought to determine whether ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during steady-state running could identify competitive collegiate distance runners who would later sustain lower extremity injuries. Normative boundaries for 10 GRF variables during braking and propulsion were established for noninjured runners using median ± scaled median absolute deviation. A subanalysis was conducted on runners with and without impact peaks in vertical GRF to mitigate the influence of impact peaks on GRF variables. We hypothesized that prior to injury, runners who later developed an injury would have more GRF variables outside of the normative boundaries than noninjured runners. Using Cliff's method, a rank-based, nonparametric method for comparing 2 independent groups, we found no statistically significant difference between the number of variables outside the boundaries for injured and noninjured runners overall (P = .17). However, injured runners without impact peaks had more variables outside the normative boundaries than noninjured runners (P < .001). This novel analytical approach demonstrates the potential for preidentifying collegiate distance runners without impact peaks who may be at risk for injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0226
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Ground Reaction Force Variables Preidentify the Probability of a Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Distance Runners?

Jill L. McNitt-Gray, Alena M. Grabowski, Harper E. Stewart, Rodger Kram et al.
2 links
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Can Ground Reaction Force Variables Preidentify the Probability of a Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Distance Runners?

Jill L. McNitt-Gray, Alena M. Grabowski, Harper E. Stewart, Rodger Kram, Michael E. Hahn, Kathryn A. Farina, Ryan S. Alcantara, Rand R. Wilcox
article en

Abstract

The incidence of lower extremity injuries in collegiate distance runners is ∼20%. Identification of a runner sustaining a potential injury remains challenging. This exploratory, cross-institutional study sought to determine whether ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during steady-state running could identify competitive collegiate distance runners who would later sustain lower extremity injuries. Normative boundaries for 10 GRF variables during braking and propulsion were established for noninjured runners using median ± scaled median absolute deviation. A subanalysis was conducted on runners with and without impact peaks in vertical GRF to mitigate the influence of impact peaks on GRF variables. We hypothesized that prior to injury, runners who later developed an injury would have more GRF variables outside of the normative boundaries than noninjured runners. Using Cliff's method, a rank-based, nonparametric method for comparing 2 independent groups, we found no statistically significant difference between the number of variables outside the boundaries for injured and noninjured runners overall (P = .17). However, injured runners without impact peaks had more variables outside the normative boundaries than noninjured runners (P < .001). This novel analytical approach demonstrates the potential for preidentifying collegiate distance runners without impact peaks who may be at risk for injury.

Journal of Applied BiomechanicsVol. 41(3)
University of Southern California (US), University of Oregon (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.