Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey

Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey

Till Bärnighausen, Justine Davies, Ali Sié, Pascal Geldsetzer et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.49
article

Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey

Till Bärnighausen, Justine Davies, Ali Sié, Pascal Geldsetzer, Maria Lisa Odland, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Guy Harling, Stephanie R. Lacey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(4)
Northwestern University (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System (ZA), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna (BF), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Wellcome Trust, Royal Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.