Patient perspectives on AI-based decision support in surgery
IPML in CRS is well-received by participants, provided that surgeons retain the ability to override model recommendations and document their decisions transparently. Trust in the surgeon remains a key factor in patient acceptance of IPML, reinforcing the need for clear explanations during consultation sessions. Regardless of the use of IPML, tailoring patient communication and addressing the quality-of-life impacts of anastomosis vs stoma are also critical.
Authors
- Saskia Haitjema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5465-4868)
- Olga Catherina Damman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-5042)
- Geert Kazemier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-3497)
- Freek D. Daams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-6342)
- Sara Ben Hmido (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9893-8407)
- Houssam Abder Rahim
- Corrette Ploem
Institutions
- Dutch Cancer Society (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Surgery Interventions & Health Technologies
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000365
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.27
Funders
- Medtronic Europe