CCTA-Guided Selective Invasive Coronary Catheterization: A Strategy to Reduce Contrast Volume and Improve Efficiency

<b>Background:</b> Symptomatic patients with unilateral obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) identified by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), involving either the right or left coronary artery, typically undergo per-protocol bilateral coronary visualization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, a selective visualization approach may be sufficient. <b>Objectives:</b> The objectives of this study were to assess the accuracy of CCTA in excluding hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with unilateral CAD and to evaluate whether a CCTA-guided selective ICA strategy can reduce procedure time and contrast agent use. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional cohort study, 454 patients with clinically suspected stable CAD who underwent CCTA prior to ICA were included. The study population consisted of 190 patients with unilateral obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis on CCTA, and an absence of obstructive CAD on the contralateral side. ICA with invasive functional assessment was used as the reference standard. <b>Results:</b> CCTA demonstrated a high accuracy, 97.4% (95% CI: 94-99%), in excluding hemodynamically significant disease in the contralateral arteries without obstructive CAD. Compared to the conventional ICA approach, a CCTA-guided selective visualization strategy resulted in significant reductions in procedure time and contrast agent usage: procedure time and contrast agent usage were reduced by 27% (95% CI: 12.1-47.5%) and 46.8% (95% CI: 27.5-67.0%), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> In patients with unilateral obstructive CAD identified by CCTA, a CCTA-guided selective ICA visualization strategy is highly accurate in ruling out hemodynamically significant CAD on the contralateral side. Additionally, this unilateral ICA approach has the potential to reduce both contrast agent usage and procedure time compared to the conventional bilateral visualization strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070890
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CCTA-Guided Selective Invasive Coronary Catheterization: A Strategy to Reduce Contrast Volume and Improve Efficiency

Ton A.C.M. Heestermans, Paul Knaapen, Jorge Dahdal, Ruurt Jukema et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
4.01
article

CCTA-Guided Selective Invasive Coronary Catheterization: A Strategy to Reduce Contrast Volume and Improve Efficiency

Ton A.C.M. Heestermans, Paul Knaapen, Jorge Dahdal, Ruurt Jukema, Ibrahim Danad, Niels van Royen, Pieter G. Raijmakers, Aernout Somsen, Ellaha Wahedi, Jorrit S. Lemkes, E. Kooijman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Symptomatic patients with unilateral obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) identified by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), involving either the right or left coronary artery, typically undergo per-protocol bilateral coronary visualization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, a selective visualization approach may be sufficient. <b>Objectives:</b> The objectives of this study were to assess the accuracy of CCTA in excluding hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with unilateral CAD and to evaluate whether a CCTA-guided selective ICA strategy can reduce procedure time and contrast agent use. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional cohort study, 454 patients with clinically suspected stable CAD who underwent CCTA prior to ICA were included. The study population consisted of 190 patients with unilateral obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis on CCTA, and an absence of obstructive CAD on the contralateral side. ICA with invasive functional assessment was used as the reference standard. <b>Results:</b> CCTA demonstrated a high accuracy, 97.4% (95% CI: 94-99%), in excluding hemodynamically significant disease in the contralateral arteries without obstructive CAD. Compared to the conventional ICA approach, a CCTA-guided selective visualization strategy resulted in significant reductions in procedure time and contrast agent usage: procedure time and contrast agent usage were reduced by 27% (95% CI: 12.1-47.5%) and 46.8% (95% CI: 27.5-67.0%), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> In patients with unilateral obstructive CAD identified by CCTA, a CCTA-guided selective ICA visualization strategy is highly accurate in ruling out hemodynamically significant CAD on the contralateral side. Additionally, this unilateral ICA approach has the potential to reduce both contrast agent usage and procedure time compared to the conventional bilateral visualization strategy.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(7)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Clínica Alemana (CL), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.