Are Deep Tissue Cultures a Reliable Alternative to Bone Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Comparative Diagnostic Study

<b>Background:</b> Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that contributes to high morbidity and an increased risk of lower extremity amputation. While bone biopsy cultures are considered the gold standard for identifying causative pathogens, their invasive nature limits widespread clinical use. This study evaluates the microbiological concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures in diagnosing DFO. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 107 patients with DFO who underwent simultaneous deep tissue and bone biopsy cultures. Patient demographics, ulcer classification, and microbiological culture results were recorded. The agreement between deep tissue and bone cultures was assessed to determine the diagnostic utility of deep tissue sampling. <b>Results:</b> The overall concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures was 51.8%. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both culture types and had the highest agreement rate (44.4%). Concordance rates were lower for Gram-negative bacteria (31.9%) and other Gram-positive microorganisms (24.2%). In 21.2% of the cases, pathogens were isolated only from deep tissue cultures, while 16.5% had positive bone cultures but negative deep tissue cultures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Deep tissue cultures demonstrate moderate microbiological concordance with bone biopsy in the diagnosis of DFO, particularly in cases with monomicrobial <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infection. While bone biopsy remains the gold standard, deep tissue cultures may be a practical alternative when bone sampling is not feasible or for patients unsuitable for surgery. However, their limited reliability in detecting Gram-negative and polymicrobial infections underscores the need for more accurate, less invasive diagnostic tools. Future research should focus on validating molecular and advanced diagnostic methods to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in DFO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070880
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Deep Tissue Cultures a Reliable Alternative to Bone Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Comparative Diagnostic Study

Müge Ayhan, Belgin Coşkun, Serap Ulusoy, İbrahim Kılınç
1 citations
Diagnostics
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
article

Are Deep Tissue Cultures a Reliable Alternative to Bone Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? A Comparative Diagnostic Study

Müge Ayhan, Belgin Coşkun, Serap Ulusoy, İbrahim Kılınç
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a serious complication of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that contributes to high morbidity and an increased risk of lower extremity amputation. While bone biopsy cultures are considered the gold standard for identifying causative pathogens, their invasive nature limits widespread clinical use. This study evaluates the microbiological concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures in diagnosing DFO. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 107 patients with DFO who underwent simultaneous deep tissue and bone biopsy cultures. Patient demographics, ulcer classification, and microbiological culture results were recorded. The agreement between deep tissue and bone cultures was assessed to determine the diagnostic utility of deep tissue sampling. <b>Results:</b> The overall concordance between deep tissue and bone cultures was 51.8%. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most frequently isolated pathogen in both culture types and had the highest agreement rate (44.4%). Concordance rates were lower for Gram-negative bacteria (31.9%) and other Gram-positive microorganisms (24.2%). In 21.2% of the cases, pathogens were isolated only from deep tissue cultures, while 16.5% had positive bone cultures but negative deep tissue cultures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Deep tissue cultures demonstrate moderate microbiological concordance with bone biopsy in the diagnosis of DFO, particularly in cases with monomicrobial <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infection. While bone biopsy remains the gold standard, deep tissue cultures may be a practical alternative when bone sampling is not feasible or for patients unsuitable for surgery. However, their limited reliability in detecting Gram-negative and polymicrobial infections underscores the need for more accurate, less invasive diagnostic tools. Future research should focus on validating molecular and advanced diagnostic methods to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in DFO.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(7)
Bilkent University (TR), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.