Monitoring cross-setting care and outcomes among older people in aged care: a national framework is needed

Establishing an evidence-based framework to monitor and evaluate quality and safety of care for older people is critical. Despite progress in health system performance monitoring in Australia, slower progress has occurred for the older population accessing aged care services. With an aging population and increasing demands on aged care and healthcare systems, there is growing recognition of the need for more coordinated and integrated care across settings. It is not uncommon for older people accessing aged care to require a range of services administered by different organisations simultaneously (e.g. primary care, home care) and sequentially (e.g. hospitals, residential care). Aged care also represents an increasingly regulated sector, with significant investment in and growing recognition of the value of quality measurement. Accountability for care quality and safety is often shared among providers, with consequent challenges in attributing responsibility. Therefore, the development of a pragmatic national framework to support high-quality, person-centred care for the older population accessing aged care services across care settings is one opportunity for shared responsibility, care monitoring, and quality improvement activities that could lead to better outcomes for this population. The strategy for framework development proposed in this perspective has implications for aged care and healthcare providers, consumers, policy makers, regulators, and academics. Once implemented, this framework has the potential to drive consistent high-quality care to improve health outcomes and wellbeing among older people accessing aged care services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Health Review
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah24294
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring cross-setting care and outcomes among older people in aged care: a national framework is needed

Olivia Ryan, Gillian E. Caughey, Len Gray, Maria C. Inacio
1 citations
Australian Health Review
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Monitoring cross-setting care and outcomes among older people in aged care: a national framework is needed

Olivia Ryan, Gillian E. Caughey, Len Gray, Maria C. Inacio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Establishing an evidence-based framework to monitor and evaluate quality and safety of care for older people is critical. Despite progress in health system performance monitoring in Australia, slower progress has occurred for the older population accessing aged care services. With an aging population and increasing demands on aged care and healthcare systems, there is growing recognition of the need for more coordinated and integrated care across settings. It is not uncommon for older people accessing aged care to require a range of services administered by different organisations simultaneously (e.g. primary care, home care) and sequentially (e.g. hospitals, residential care). Aged care also represents an increasingly regulated sector, with significant investment in and growing recognition of the value of quality measurement. Accountability for care quality and safety is often shared among providers, with consequent challenges in attributing responsibility. Therefore, the development of a pragmatic national framework to support high-quality, person-centred care for the older population accessing aged care services across care settings is one opportunity for shared responsibility, care monitoring, and quality improvement activities that could lead to better outcomes for this population. The strategy for framework development proposed in this perspective has implications for aged care and healthcare providers, consumers, policy makers, regulators, and academics. Once implemented, this framework has the potential to drive consistent high-quality care to improve health outcomes and wellbeing among older people accessing aged care services.

Australian Health ReviewVol. 49(2)
The University of Queensland (AU), Flinders University (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.