Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations

Scientific machine learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques to uncover the governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, universal differential equations (UDEs) combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, such as neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters for both the mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. However, the robustness and applicability of these resultant models hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with their parameters and predictive capabilities. In this work, we provide a formalization of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate key frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analyzing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0444
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations

Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer, David Fernandes del Pozo, Nina Schmid
7 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
9.27
article

Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations

Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer, David Fernandes del Pozo, Nina Schmid
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Scientific machine learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques to uncover the governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, universal differential equations (UDEs) combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, such as neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters for both the mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. However, the robustness and applicability of these resultant models hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with their parameters and predictive capabilities. In this work, we provide a formalization of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate key frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analyzing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2293)
University of Bonn (DE), Center for Environmental Health (US), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), Ghent University (BE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Vlaamse regering, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
9.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.