Pilosocereus cristalinensis should not be regarded as conspecific with P. machrisii (Cereeae, Cactaceae)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phytotaxa
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.696.3.6
Primary Topic
Botanical Research and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilosocereus cristalinensis should not be regarded as conspecific with P. machrisii (Cereeae, Cactaceae)

Fabricio de Oliveira Pereira, Matias Köhler
Phytotaxa
Botanical Research and Applications
article

Pilosocereus cristalinensis should not be regarded as conspecific with P. machrisii (Cereeae, Cactaceae)

Fabricio de Oliveira Pereira, Matias Köhler
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
PhytotaxaVol. 696(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Botanical Research and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pilosocereus cristalinensis should not be regarded as conspecific with P. machrisii (Cereeae, Cactaceae) — Fabricio de Oliveira Pereira, Matias Köhler · Phytotaxa (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS