Vertical farming limitations and potential demonstrated by back-of-the-envelope calculations

Improving food security and reducing the environmental footprint of food production is urgently needed to satisfy the growing global population in a time of climate, biodiversity, and water pressures. Indoor vertical farming is largely independent of environmental conditions and is reported to reduce the land and water required for food production. However, vertical farming requires large amounts of energy. Based on the vertical farming energy cost, we derive from basic considerations a current minimum cost of ≈$10/kg dry plant matter. Vertical farming is therefore not currently competitive with dried cereals or pulses (e.g. wheat, rice, and soybeans). We also show limited current competitiveness for products like tomatoes and lettuce, despite a low dry matter content. Whereas the environmental implications of vertical farming depend on the electricity source. Using the average newly installed electricity mix in recent years (predominantly solar and wind, with some coal, natural gas, and bioenergy), vertical farming could substantially increase greenhouse gas emissions and has limited land benefits compared with conventional agriculture. Using exclusively electricity from photovoltaics, some environmental benefits could be achieved for crops with a low dry matter content like lettuce, but this is more limited for dried crops like wheat. The transparent calculations we provide here set out challenges for vertical farming and highlight that improvements in both the overall vertical farming energetic efficiency (≈1% to 2%), as well as low-impact electricity sources are needed in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf056
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vertical farming limitations and potential demonstrated by back-of-the-envelope calculations

Εlad Noor, Ron Milo, Samuel J Lovat
5 citations
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
4.00
article

Vertical farming limitations and potential demonstrated by back-of-the-envelope calculations

Εlad Noor, Ron Milo, Samuel J Lovat
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Improving food security and reducing the environmental footprint of food production is urgently needed to satisfy the growing global population in a time of climate, biodiversity, and water pressures. Indoor vertical farming is largely independent of environmental conditions and is reported to reduce the land and water required for food production. However, vertical farming requires large amounts of energy. Based on the vertical farming energy cost, we derive from basic considerations a current minimum cost of ≈$10/kg dry plant matter. Vertical farming is therefore not currently competitive with dried cereals or pulses (e.g. wheat, rice, and soybeans). We also show limited current competitiveness for products like tomatoes and lettuce, despite a low dry matter content. Whereas the environmental implications of vertical farming depend on the electricity source. Using the average newly installed electricity mix in recent years (predominantly solar and wind, with some coal, natural gas, and bioenergy), vertical farming could substantially increase greenhouse gas emissions and has limited land benefits compared with conventional agriculture. Using exclusively electricity from photovoltaics, some environmental benefits could be achieved for crops with a low dry matter content like lettuce, but this is more limited for dried crops like wheat. The transparent calculations we provide here set out challenges for vertical farming and highlight that improvements in both the overall vertical farming energetic efficiency (≈1% to 2%), as well as low-impact electricity sources are needed in the future.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGYVol. 198(3)
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science (US), Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Weizmann Institute of Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.