Children’s Use of Race in Their Social Judgments: A Multi-Site, Multi-Racial Group Comparison

Studies assessing children's use of race in social judgment have often focused on White participants and usually include targets of only one or two racial backgrounds. They have also employed a wide range of methods, making comparisons across studies difficult. In this paper, we recruited a large sample of children ages 4- to 6-years-old (<i>N</i> = 666) belonging to the United States' four largest racial/ethnic groups (Black, Latine, Asian, and White) in five geographic regions (Durham, NC; Honolulu, HI; Long Beach, CA; New Haven, CT; Seattle, WA) to broadly examine children's race-based social judgments (including measures of racial attitudes, interpersonal distance, resource allocation, and status perception). Overall, children demonstrated consistent ingroup biases in the attitudes, resource allocation, and interpersonal distance measures, but did not systematically associate their ingroup with higher status. When analyzed separately by participant race, White children tended to show these effects at above chance rates, sometimes significantly more than children in other racial groups. Results for Black, Latine, and Asian children were more variable across measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collabra Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.132489
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children’s Use of Race in Their Social Judgments: A Multi-Site, Multi-Racial Group Comparison

Elizabeth Enright, May Ling Halim, Sarah E. Gaither, Yarrow Dunham et al.
2 citations
Collabra Psychology
Early Childhood Education and Development
17.85
article

Children’s Use of Race in Their Social Judgments: A Multi-Site, Multi-Racial Group Comparison

Elizabeth Enright, May Ling Halim, Sarah E. Gaither, Yarrow Dunham, Kristin Pauker, Kristina R. Olson, Mercedes Muñoz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Studies assessing children's use of race in social judgment have often focused on White participants and usually include targets of only one or two racial backgrounds. They have also employed a wide range of methods, making comparisons across studies difficult. In this paper, we recruited a large sample of children ages 4- to 6-years-old (<i>N</i> = 666) belonging to the United States' four largest racial/ethnic groups (Black, Latine, Asian, and White) in five geographic regions (Durham, NC; Honolulu, HI; Long Beach, CA; New Haven, CT; Seattle, WA) to broadly examine children's race-based social judgments (including measures of racial attitudes, interpersonal distance, resource allocation, and status perception). Overall, children demonstrated consistent ingroup biases in the attitudes, resource allocation, and interpersonal distance measures, but did not systematically associate their ingroup with higher status. When analyzed separately by participant race, White children tended to show these effects at above chance rates, sometimes significantly more than children in other racial groups. Results for Black, Latine, and Asian children were more variable across measures.

Collabra PsychologyVol. 11(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Duke University (US), Princeton University (US), Yale University (US), California State University, Long Beach (US), St. Mary's College of Maryland (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Early Childhood Education and Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.