Analysis of Absorption-Compression Hybrid Refrigeration Systems for Using Low-Temperature Heat Sources

Abstract The main objective of this study is to explore and compare the energy and exergy performance of main configurations of nonhybrid (conventional), hybrid (with low- and high-pressure-side booster compressor), and absorption refrigeration systems using LiBr–H2O and H2O–NH3 working solutions, with focus on their ability to efficiently utilize low-temperature driving heat under hot climate conditions and to address their limitations. At a condensing temperature of 40 °C, the nonhybrid absorption systems can operate at generator temperatures as low as 81 °C and 102 °C for LiBr–H2O and H2O–NH3 systems, respectively, with a coefficient of performance (COP) of 0.67 and 0.30, respectively. Hybridization of the absorption refrigeration units permits the operation of the LiBr–H2O generator at as low as 70 °C, and of the H2O–NH3 generator at as low as 89 °C, with COP 38% higher than that of the nonhybrid system. The high-pressure-side hybridization reduces the COP, but the low-pressure-side hybridization has a COP comparable to that of the nonhybrid system operating at higher generator temperatures. Hybridization of the system on both sides complicates it and is thus justified when heat is available only at the lower generator temperature (70 °C). Hybridization when the generator temperature exceeds 85 °C for the LiBr–H2O system, and 120 °C for the H2O–NH3 system, has no operating advantage because the simpler nonhybrid system can operate with a higher COP (0.84 versus 0.8).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of energy resources technology.
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068360
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Absorption-Compression Hybrid Refrigeration Systems for Using Low-Temperature Heat Sources

A.M. Alklaibi, Noam Lior
1 citations
Journal of energy resources technology.
Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
0.71
article

Analysis of Absorption-Compression Hybrid Refrigeration Systems for Using Low-Temperature Heat Sources

A.M. Alklaibi, Noam Lior
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The main objective of this study is to explore and compare the energy and exergy performance of main configurations of nonhybrid (conventional), hybrid (with low- and high-pressure-side booster compressor), and absorption refrigeration systems using LiBr–H2O and H2O–NH3 working solutions, with focus on their ability to efficiently utilize low-temperature driving heat under hot climate conditions and to address their limitations. At a condensing temperature of 40 °C, the nonhybrid absorption systems can operate at generator temperatures as low as 81 °C and 102 °C for LiBr–H2O and H2O–NH3 systems, respectively, with a coefficient of performance (COP) of 0.67 and 0.30, respectively. Hybridization of the absorption refrigeration units permits the operation of the LiBr–H2O generator at as low as 70 °C, and of the H2O–NH3 generator at as low as 89 °C, with COP 38% higher than that of the nonhybrid system. The high-pressure-side hybridization reduces the COP, but the low-pressure-side hybridization has a COP comparable to that of the nonhybrid system operating at higher generator temperatures. Hybridization of the system on both sides complicates it and is thus justified when heat is available only at the lower generator temperature (70 °C). Hybridization when the generator temperature exceeds 85 °C for the LiBr–H2O system, and 120 °C for the H2O–NH3 system, has no operating advantage because the simpler nonhybrid system can operate with a higher COP (0.84 versus 0.8).

Journal of energy resources technology.Vol. 1(5)
Majmaah University (SA), Mechanics' Institute (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.