Analyzing institutional platform power: Evolving relations of dependence in the mobile digital advertising ecosystem

This article calls for systematic analysis of the accumulation and exercise of institutional platform power in the digital economy. We examine how the relatively open mobile advertising ecosystem is nevertheless dominated by a handful of platform conglomerates, most prominently Google, Facebook, and Apple. Although extant scholarship acknowledges the concentration of corporate power in digital advertising, as well as its cultural, societal, and environmental harms, a comprehensive approach to platform power is missing. Providing a framework to develop such insights, we analyze how shifts in the advertising ecosystem are driven by four interrelated institutional platform strategies: infrastructuralization, platformization, conglomeration, and financialization. The 2021 introduction and subsequent rollout of Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework serves as an example to demonstrate that even though institutional relationships of dependence are constantly evolving, control over infrastructural nodes tends to entrench the already dominant position of leading platform conglomerates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251314405
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing institutional platform power: Evolving relations of dependence in the mobile digital advertising ecosystem

David B. Nieborg, Thomas Poell
9 citations
New Media & Society
Digital Platforms and Economics
20.04
article

Analyzing institutional platform power: Evolving relations of dependence in the mobile digital advertising ecosystem

David B. Nieborg, Thomas Poell
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This article calls for systematic analysis of the accumulation and exercise of institutional platform power in the digital economy. We examine how the relatively open mobile advertising ecosystem is nevertheless dominated by a handful of platform conglomerates, most prominently Google, Facebook, and Apple. Although extant scholarship acknowledges the concentration of corporate power in digital advertising, as well as its cultural, societal, and environmental harms, a comprehensive approach to platform power is missing. Providing a framework to develop such insights, we analyze how shifts in the advertising ecosystem are driven by four interrelated institutional platform strategies: infrastructuralization, platformization, conglomeration, and financialization. The 2021 introduction and subsequent rollout of Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework serves as an example to demonstrate that even though institutional relationships of dependence are constantly evolving, control over infrastructural nodes tends to entrench the already dominant position of leading platform conglomerates.

New Media & SocietyVol. 27(4)
University of Toronto (CA), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Platforms and Economics
20.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing institutional platform power: Evolving relations of dependence in the mobile digital advertising ecosystem — David B. Nieborg, Thomas Poell · New Media & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS