Effects of Thoracic Mobilization and Sling-Based Exercises on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Specific Neck Pain

Background: Non-specific neck pain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition and the fourth most common cause worldwide. Middle-aged women are more likely to have it. In addition to being a risk factor for severe spine pathologies and functional impairment, this pain is well-recognized to be linked to worse worker productivity and quality of life. Objective: To determine the effects of thoracic mobilization and sling-based exercises on functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. Methodology: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial consisting of 52 participants was conducted. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups using the lottery method. Group A received sling-based thoracic active exercises and cervical manual therapy, while Group B received thoracic mobilizations and cervical manual therapy. The neck disability index and SF-36 questionnaire were used to measure function and quality of life. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows data was not normally distributed. Mann-Whitney U Test for between-group analysis and Friedman test for within-group analysis was used. Results: The mean rank for neck disability index in group A at the baseline was 27.94 and in group B 25.06 with a Z value of 1.158 and a P-value of 0.247. At the end of treatment eight weeks, the mean rank for neck disability index in group A was 19.30 and in group B 33.70, with a Z value of -4.025 and a p-value of 0.02. Group A shows more significant improvements, at weeks two, four, six, and eight treatment, in the domains of quality-of-life (physical functioning), role limitation due to physical health, emotional problems, emotional wellbeing, social functioning, pain, energy/fatigue, and general health by increasing the mean value of these domains. Conclusion: Both groups experienced significant improvements in their symptoms, but Group A benefits were more apparent. While thoracic mobilization provides faster, short-term relief, the dynamic nature of sling-based exercises gives broader, longer-lasting benefits, especially in the long-term treatment of pain and general patient well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55735/hjprs.v5i2.344
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Thoracic Mobilization and Sling-Based Exercises on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Specific Neck Pain

Wajeeha Zahra, Muhammad Sarfraz Khan, Iqra Waseem, Samar Fatima Zehra et al.
The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Effects of Thoracic Mobilization and Sling-Based Exercises on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Specific Neck Pain

Wajeeha Zahra, Muhammad Sarfraz Khan, Iqra Waseem, Samar Fatima Zehra, Hafsa Chandio, Yasmeen Lakho, Aisha Leghari
article en

Abstract

Background: Non-specific neck pain is the most prevalent musculoskeletal condition and the fourth most common cause worldwide. Middle-aged women are more likely to have it. In addition to being a risk factor for severe spine pathologies and functional impairment, this pain is well-recognized to be linked to worse worker productivity and quality of life. Objective: To determine the effects of thoracic mobilization and sling-based exercises on functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. Methodology: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial consisting of 52 participants was conducted. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups using the lottery method. Group A received sling-based thoracic active exercises and cervical manual therapy, while Group B received thoracic mobilizations and cervical manual therapy. The neck disability index and SF-36 questionnaire were used to measure function and quality of life. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows data was not normally distributed. Mann-Whitney U Test for between-group analysis and Friedman test for within-group analysis was used. Results: The mean rank for neck disability index in group A at the baseline was 27.94 and in group B 25.06 with a Z value of 1.158 and a P-value of 0.247. At the end of treatment eight weeks, the mean rank for neck disability index in group A was 19.30 and in group B 33.70, with a Z value of -4.025 and a p-value of 0.02. Group A shows more significant improvements, at weeks two, four, six, and eight treatment, in the domains of quality-of-life (physical functioning), role limitation due to physical health, emotional problems, emotional wellbeing, social functioning, pain, energy/fatigue, and general health by increasing the mean value of these domains. Conclusion: Both groups experienced significant improvements in their symptoms, but Group A benefits were more apparent. While thoracic mobilization provides faster, short-term relief, the dynamic nature of sling-based exercises gives broader, longer-lasting benefits, especially in the long-term treatment of pain and general patient well-being.

The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation SciencesVol. 5(2)
Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar (PK), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Lahore (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.