Globally optimal basic design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers

Abstract A novel approach (Complete Set Trimming) to address the globally optimal design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers (Shell and Tube, Double Pipe, Plate, etc.) is presented. Three arrangements: Series, Parallel, Series–Parallel, and Parallel–Series, for minimizing area, CAPEX, or total annualized cost are considered. The geometry of all (equal) units is determined together with the number of units and the fluid allocation. The article illustrates the need to minimize CAPEX explicitly instead of using the minimization of Area as its proxy objective function. In addition, the influence of available pressure drop in the final optimal design is also discussed. Finally, the article shows that solutions obtained by minimizing the Total Annualized Cost (TAC) render different solutions than those obtained by minimizing CAPEX, indicating that pumping costs matter, depending on the balance between operational and capital costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18838
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Globally optimal basic design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers

André L.M. Nahes, André L.H. Costa, Eduardo M. Queiroz, Javier A. Francesconi et al.
AIChE Journal
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Globally optimal basic design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers

André L.M. Nahes, André L.H. Costa, Eduardo M. Queiroz, Javier A. Francesconi, Miguel J. Bagajewicz, Diego G. Oliva
article en

Abstract

Abstract A novel approach (Complete Set Trimming) to address the globally optimal design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers (Shell and Tube, Double Pipe, Plate, etc.) is presented. Three arrangements: Series, Parallel, Series–Parallel, and Parallel–Series, for minimizing area, CAPEX, or total annualized cost are considered. The geometry of all (equal) units is determined together with the number of units and the fluid allocation. The article illustrates the need to minimize CAPEX explicitly instead of using the minimization of Area as its proxy objective function. In addition, the influence of available pressure drop in the final optimal design is also discussed. Finally, the article shows that solutions obtained by minimizing the Total Annualized Cost (TAC) render different solutions than those obtained by minimizing CAPEX, indicating that pumping costs matter, depending on the balance between operational and capital costs.

AIChE JournalVol. 71(7)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), National Technological University (AR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (AR), University of Oklahoma (US)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Globally optimal basic design of multiple‐unit heat exchangers — André L.M. Nahes, André L.H. Costa, et al. · AIChE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS