Critical Success Factors of Participatory Community Planning with Geospatial Digital Participatory Platforms

In recent years, Digital Participatory Platforms (DPPs) have become an increasingly popular tool for citizen participation in community planning processes. They serve municipalities, citizen initiatives, and other planning authorities as digital tools to collect feedback, discuss ideas, solve problems and monitor small-scale planning processes within their communities. In addition, DPPs facilitate the integration of the spatial domain into participatory community planning. In this paper, we assess the most important Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of participatory community planning with geospatial DPPs, and analyze the potential, opportunities, and challenges associated with integrating these platforms into community planning. We analyze the results of a digital questionnaire that we shared with a selected group of expert scholars and community stakeholders. We then contextualize this feedback with our experiences from the piloting phase and commercial roll-out of the ‘Bürgercockpit’-application for participatory community planning within the Austrian Agenda21-framework. As a result, we identify the most important CSFs of participatory community planning with geospatial DPPs. This set of CSFs should provide a better orientation on how to complement well-established analog participatory methods and practices with geospatial DPPs for the co-production of shared visions and solutions, ultimately empowering all stakeholders of a planning process to better manage their communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14040153
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Success Factors of Participatory Community Planning with Geospatial Digital Participatory Platforms

Barbora Haltofová, Leo Zurita-Arthos, Mona Bartling, Karl Atzmanstorfer et al.
2 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Smart Cities and Technologies
2.27
article

Critical Success Factors of Participatory Community Planning with Geospatial Digital Participatory Platforms

Barbora Haltofová, Leo Zurita-Arthos, Mona Bartling, Karl Atzmanstorfer, Anton Eitzinger, Judith Grubinger-Preiner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In recent years, Digital Participatory Platforms (DPPs) have become an increasingly popular tool for citizen participation in community planning processes. They serve municipalities, citizen initiatives, and other planning authorities as digital tools to collect feedback, discuss ideas, solve problems and monitor small-scale planning processes within their communities. In addition, DPPs facilitate the integration of the spatial domain into participatory community planning. In this paper, we assess the most important Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of participatory community planning with geospatial DPPs, and analyze the potential, opportunities, and challenges associated with integrating these platforms into community planning. We analyze the results of a digital questionnaire that we shared with a selected group of expert scholars and community stakeholders. We then contextualize this feedback with our experiences from the piloting phase and commercial roll-out of the ‘Bürgercockpit’-application for participatory community planning within the Austrian Agenda21-framework. As a result, we identify the most important CSFs of participatory community planning with geospatial DPPs. This set of CSFs should provide a better orientation on how to complement well-established analog participatory methods and practices with geospatial DPPs for the co-production of shared visions and solutions, ultimately empowering all stakeholders of a planning process to better manage their communities.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(4)
Tomas Bata University in Zlín (CZ), University of Salzburg (AT), Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Austrian Science Fund, Universität Salzburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Smart Cities and Technologies
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.