Identifying radiation-induced symptoms from an interview survey

Studies on the atomic bomb have reported a relatively high incidence of acute symptoms, even at below the threshold dose of radiation, and are therefore assumed to include symptoms caused by non-radiation factors. In this study, to investigate the influence of external injuries and burns on symptom expression and the possibility of distinguishing radiation-induced symptoms, we reanalysed data from the survey conducted immediately after the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of radiation per 1 Gy for the occurrence of 16 symptoms ranged from 1.14 to 1.46, based on sex, age at the time of the bombing, radiation dose, external injuries, and burns. This study also included 243 deaths, and thus provides information not seen in other studies, such as the frequency of symptoms in deaths and ORs for symptom occurrence. However, the adjusted ORs for external injuries or burns were smaller than the unadjusted ORs, suggesting that external injuries and burns confound the development of radiation-induced symptoms. Symptom data obtained from interviews such as those used in this study may not be appropriate for use alone because such data include non-radiation factors. Radiation-induced symptoms are often considered to be a syndrome, and the multiple correspondence analyses also revealed that high-dose exposure is associated with nausea and vomiting, subsequent epilation and bleeding tendency as a bone marrow disorder, and inflammation symptoms due to a weakened immune system. Thus, radiation exposure may be indicated by not just one, but rather, a combination of symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf014
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying radiation-induced symptoms from an interview survey

Noboru Takamura, Yasushi Miyazaki, Kenichi Yokota, Mariko Mine
Journal of Radiation Research
Risk Perception and Management
article

Identifying radiation-induced symptoms from an interview survey

Noboru Takamura, Yasushi Miyazaki, Kenichi Yokota, Mariko Mine
article en

Abstract

Studies on the atomic bomb have reported a relatively high incidence of acute symptoms, even at below the threshold dose of radiation, and are therefore assumed to include symptoms caused by non-radiation factors. In this study, to investigate the influence of external injuries and burns on symptom expression and the possibility of distinguishing radiation-induced symptoms, we reanalysed data from the survey conducted immediately after the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of radiation per 1 Gy for the occurrence of 16 symptoms ranged from 1.14 to 1.46, based on sex, age at the time of the bombing, radiation dose, external injuries, and burns. This study also included 243 deaths, and thus provides information not seen in other studies, such as the frequency of symptoms in deaths and ORs for symptom occurrence. However, the adjusted ORs for external injuries or burns were smaller than the unadjusted ORs, suggesting that external injuries and burns confound the development of radiation-induced symptoms. Symptom data obtained from interviews such as those used in this study may not be appropriate for use alone because such data include non-radiation factors. Radiation-induced symptoms are often considered to be a syndrome, and the multiple correspondence analyses also revealed that high-dose exposure is associated with nausea and vomiting, subsequent epilation and bleeding tendency as a bone marrow disorder, and inflammation symptoms due to a weakened immune system. Thus, radiation exposure may be indicated by not just one, but rather, a combination of symptoms.

Journal of Radiation ResearchVol. 66(3)
Nagasaki University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.