Comparing kinetic proofreading and kinetic segregation for T cell receptor activation

The T cell receptor (TCR) is a key component of the adaptive immune system, recognizing foreign antigens (ligands) and triggering an immune response. To explain the high sensitivity and selectivity of the TCR in discriminating “self” from “non-self” ligands, most models evoke kinetic proofreading (KP) schemes, however it is unclear how competing models used for TCR triggering, such as the kinetic segregation (KS) model, influence KP performance. In this paper, we consider two different TCR triggering models and their influence on subsequent KP-based ligand discrimination by the TCR: a classic conformational change model (CC-KP), where ligand-TCR binding is strictly required for activation, and the kinetic segregation model (KS-KP), where only residence of the TCR within a close contact devoid of kinases is required for its activation. Building on previous work, our computational model permits a head-to-head comparison of these models . While we find that both models can be used to explain the probability of TCR activation across much of the parameter space, we find biologically important regions in the parameter space where significant differences in performance can be expected. Furthermore, we show that the available experimental evidence may favor the KS-KP model over CC-KP. Our results may be used to motivate and guide future experiments to determine accurate mathematical models of TCR function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023003
Citations
3
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing kinetic proofreading and kinetic segregation for T cell receptor activation

Kristina A. Ganzinger, Andrew W. Eckford, Alexander S. Moffett
3 citations
Physical Review Research
CAR-T cell therapy research
3.14
article

Comparing kinetic proofreading and kinetic segregation for T cell receptor activation

Kristina A. Ganzinger, Andrew W. Eckford, Alexander S. Moffett
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The T cell receptor (TCR) is a key component of the adaptive immune system, recognizing foreign antigens (ligands) and triggering an immune response. To explain the high sensitivity and selectivity of the TCR in discriminating “self” from “non-self” ligands, most models evoke kinetic proofreading (KP) schemes, however it is unclear how competing models used for TCR triggering, such as the kinetic segregation (KS) model, influence KP performance. In this paper, we consider two different TCR triggering models and their influence on subsequent KP-based ligand discrimination by the TCR: a classic conformational change model (CC-KP), where ligand-TCR binding is strictly required for activation, and the kinetic segregation model (KS-KP), where only residence of the TCR within a close contact devoid of kinases is required for its activation. Building on previous work, our computational model permits a head-to-head comparison of these models . While we find that both models can be used to explain the probability of TCR activation across much of the parameter space, we find biologically important regions in the parameter space where significant differences in performance can be expected. Furthermore, we show that the available experimental evidence may favor the KS-KP model over CC-KP. Our results may be used to motivate and guide future experiments to determine accurate mathematical models of TCR function.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(2)
York University (CA), Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (NL), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Oncode Institute, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
CAR-T cell therapy research
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.