A Simplified Criterea-Based Martix for Weighting Project Activities and Phases

Purpose: The purpose of the current paper is to set the elements of an objective matrix that could be easily used by project teams to assign weights to the different phases and activities of a project with minimal individual variance between the evaluators. Materials and Methods: In the recent study, a field research approach was followed. Six evaluators were first asked to subjectively assign weights to six activities of a project. Later the evaluators were asked to answer ten predefined closed questions which covered the financial, resources, time and dependency on activities and technology as well as the prerequisites of the project activity. The results of the answers were used to assign weights to the activities by calculating the percent of the YES answers from the total number of the questions answered. Statistical analysis was performed to check whether the use of predefined criteria significantly affects the weights of the project activities and phases compared to the subjective weighting approach. Findings: The higher standard deviation of the subjective evaluation activities dataset in comparison to the criterial-based evaluation dataset indicates the variability between the evaluators. In practical terms, this means that the criteria-based evaluation provides more consistent evaluation results by the different evaluators. This has been further proved by the statistically significant t-test results of activity ONE and activity TWO despite the none-significant results of activities THREE to FIVE. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The findings of the current study showed the significance of the use of a predefined criteria in assigning weights to a project activities and phases. The author strongly recommends the adoption of the set criteria by the project teams for weighting project phases. The inclusion of these criteria in the commonly used project management software will indeed improve the project management process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Project Management
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47672/ijpm.2663
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Simplified Criterea-Based Martix for Weighting Project Activities and Phases

Hamid Ragab Orban
International Journal of Project Management
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

A Simplified Criterea-Based Martix for Weighting Project Activities and Phases

Hamid Ragab Orban
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the current paper is to set the elements of an objective matrix that could be easily used by project teams to assign weights to the different phases and activities of a project with minimal individual variance between the evaluators. Materials and Methods: In the recent study, a field research approach was followed. Six evaluators were first asked to subjectively assign weights to six activities of a project. Later the evaluators were asked to answer ten predefined closed questions which covered the financial, resources, time and dependency on activities and technology as well as the prerequisites of the project activity. The results of the answers were used to assign weights to the activities by calculating the percent of the YES answers from the total number of the questions answered. Statistical analysis was performed to check whether the use of predefined criteria significantly affects the weights of the project activities and phases compared to the subjective weighting approach. Findings: The higher standard deviation of the subjective evaluation activities dataset in comparison to the criterial-based evaluation dataset indicates the variability between the evaluators. In practical terms, this means that the criteria-based evaluation provides more consistent evaluation results by the different evaluators. This has been further proved by the statistically significant t-test results of activity ONE and activity TWO despite the none-significant results of activities THREE to FIVE. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The findings of the current study showed the significance of the use of a predefined criteria in assigning weights to a project activities and phases. The author strongly recommends the adoption of the set criteria by the project teams for weighting project phases. The inclusion of these criteria in the commonly used project management software will indeed improve the project management process.

International Journal of Project ManagementVol. 7(1)
Abu Dhabi Health Services (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.