On the Issue of Creating a Digital Forensic Model for Collecting Electronic Evidence in the Investigation of Cybercrimes

The authors consider the problem of creating a digital forensic model for collecting electronic evidence in the investigation of transnational cybercrimes. A comparison method was used to analyze the criminal legislation of some countries, which made it possible to identify common areas of state activity to counteract such crimes, as well as to formulate the authors’ definition of cybercrime. The authors also analyze specific elements of crimes provided for in the criminal legislations of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan. The paper presents the results of statistical research reflecting the dynamics of committing and solving crimes involving the use of information and telecommunications technologies or in the field of computer information from 2018 to 2023. Based on the analysis of the current state of cybercrime, the authors formulate trends that will determine the specifics of cybercrime until 2030. The authors come to the conclusion that, at the state level, heads of law enforcement agencies and departments regard the task of countering cybercrime as a priority, and that authors of research publications have been paying close attention to the problems of combating cybercrime in the context of digitalization in recent years. Nevertheless, the disclosure and investigation of cybercrimes involves overcoming numerous difficulties and limitations, especially in connection with collecting criminally significant electronic information. To solve this problem, the authors clarify the necessity and fundamental requirements for the proposed forensic model of collecting electronic evidence for these crimes, assess the advantages and disadvantages of groups of existing digital forensic models, including the group «general digital forensic models» in the investigation of all criminal cases for the crimes under consideration. This group of models will define the stages and sub-stages of the investigation, conducted sequentially. A group of models is proposed that defines the stages and substages of the previous group, which is described as a group of «models for the stages of investigation of specific types of crimes» and a group of «digital forensic models in many other environments according to technological and legislative requirements.» In addition, the authors propose an abstract-level model aimed at collecting electronic evidence, combined with the knowledge of various branches of law and applied legal sciences (operational investigative activities, criminology, forensic expertise, criminal procedure, etc.) and existing technological platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Criminology
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2024.18(4).398-411
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Issue of Creating a Digital Forensic Model for Collecting Electronic Evidence in the Investigation of Cybercrimes

Thi Binh Nguyen, Thi Thu Hoai Nguyen, Tatyana Tolstukhina, Alexander Svetlichny et al.
Russian Journal of Criminology
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

On the Issue of Creating a Digital Forensic Model for Collecting Electronic Evidence in the Investigation of Cybercrimes

Thi Binh Nguyen, Thi Thu Hoai Nguyen, Tatyana Tolstukhina, Alexander Svetlichny, Ulduz Musayeva, Van Hung Tew
article en

Abstract

The authors consider the problem of creating a digital forensic model for collecting electronic evidence in the investigation of transnational cybercrimes. A comparison method was used to analyze the criminal legislation of some countries, which made it possible to identify common areas of state activity to counteract such crimes, as well as to formulate the authors’ definition of cybercrime. The authors also analyze specific elements of crimes provided for in the criminal legislations of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan. The paper presents the results of statistical research reflecting the dynamics of committing and solving crimes involving the use of information and telecommunications technologies or in the field of computer information from 2018 to 2023. Based on the analysis of the current state of cybercrime, the authors formulate trends that will determine the specifics of cybercrime until 2030. The authors come to the conclusion that, at the state level, heads of law enforcement agencies and departments regard the task of countering cybercrime as a priority, and that authors of research publications have been paying close attention to the problems of combating cybercrime in the context of digitalization in recent years. Nevertheless, the disclosure and investigation of cybercrimes involves overcoming numerous difficulties and limitations, especially in connection with collecting criminally significant electronic information. To solve this problem, the authors clarify the necessity and fundamental requirements for the proposed forensic model of collecting electronic evidence for these crimes, assess the advantages and disadvantages of groups of existing digital forensic models, including the group «general digital forensic models» in the investigation of all criminal cases for the crimes under consideration. This group of models will define the stages and sub-stages of the investigation, conducted sequentially. A group of models is proposed that defines the stages and substages of the previous group, which is described as a group of «models for the stages of investigation of specific types of crimes» and a group of «digital forensic models in many other environments according to technological and legislative requirements.» In addition, the authors propose an abstract-level model aimed at collecting electronic evidence, combined with the knowledge of various branches of law and applied legal sciences (operational investigative activities, criminology, forensic expertise, criminal procedure, etc.) and existing technological platforms.

Russian Journal of CriminologyVol. 18(4)
Tula State University (RU), Hue University (VN), Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Academy of Public Administration (AZ), Academy of Social Sciences (GB), National Law University, Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.