A Two‐Panel Delphi Study on Risk Factors of Adolescent Suicide in South Korea

ABSTRACT This study aimed to identify and reach a consensus on factors contributing to adolescent suicidality following biopsychosocial model. The research was conducted in three stages: (1) literature review and school counselor interview on self‐harm and suicidal risk factors in the adolescent population; (2) development of a list of risk factors (3) Delphi survey on counselor panel and adolescent panel. Three rounds of the Delphi questionnaire were conducted for each panel. Results discovered that there was consensus between the counselors and adolescents as well as counselor and adolescent exclusive risk factors. Both panels agreed on ‘psychiatric difficulties,’ ‘guilt,’ ‘perceived burdensomeness,’ ‘feeling worthlessness,’ ‘powerlessness,’ ‘hopelessness,’ ‘acquired capability for suicide,’ ‘positive expectations of death,’ ‘lack of meaning in life,’ ‘absence of alternatives to self‐harm,’ ‘loneliness,’ ‘impulsivity,’ ‘exposure to problematic parenting,’ ‘family conflict,’ ‘domestic abuse,’ ‘experience of school violence’ ‘bullying or being out casted’, ‘loss of reliance’ and ‘economic hardship.’ Counselor panel exclusive consensus represented the importance of a broad range of risk factors, while adolescents suggested risk factors using expressions that specifically and delicately revealed internal experiences. The consented risk factors could enhance adolescent suicide prevention, as they were validated by the key stakeholders, the adolescents in crisis, and their counselors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23483
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Two‐Panel Delphi Study on Risk Factors of Adolescent Suicide in South Korea

Dong Hun Lee, Sangin Lee, Young‐Soon Lee, Mo Hyun Yang
2 citations
Psychology in the Schools
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
4.61
article

A Two‐Panel Delphi Study on Risk Factors of Adolescent Suicide in South Korea

Dong Hun Lee, Sangin Lee, Young‐Soon Lee, Mo Hyun Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to identify and reach a consensus on factors contributing to adolescent suicidality following biopsychosocial model. The research was conducted in three stages: (1) literature review and school counselor interview on self‐harm and suicidal risk factors in the adolescent population; (2) development of a list of risk factors (3) Delphi survey on counselor panel and adolescent panel. Three rounds of the Delphi questionnaire were conducted for each panel. Results discovered that there was consensus between the counselors and adolescents as well as counselor and adolescent exclusive risk factors. Both panels agreed on ‘psychiatric difficulties,’ ‘guilt,’ ‘perceived burdensomeness,’ ‘feeling worthlessness,’ ‘powerlessness,’ ‘hopelessness,’ ‘acquired capability for suicide,’ ‘positive expectations of death,’ ‘lack of meaning in life,’ ‘absence of alternatives to self‐harm,’ ‘loneliness,’ ‘impulsivity,’ ‘exposure to problematic parenting,’ ‘family conflict,’ ‘domestic abuse,’ ‘experience of school violence’ ‘bullying or being out casted’, ‘loss of reliance’ and ‘economic hardship.’ Counselor panel exclusive consensus represented the importance of a broad range of risk factors, while adolescents suggested risk factors using expressions that specifically and delicately revealed internal experiences. The consented risk factors could enhance adolescent suicide prevention, as they were validated by the key stakeholders, the adolescents in crisis, and their counselors.

Psychology in the SchoolsVol. 62(8)
Jeonbuk National University (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.