Ensuring We Assess What We Value in Laboratory Work

Learning how to do chemistry is a valued goal for students undertaking laboratory work in university chemistry degrees; however, in many cases, it is not the student’s laboratory work that is assessed but a report that could just as easily be written using data supplied by the course coordinator. Building on recent work establishing the use of chemistry learning outcomes in course evaluations, a framework for evaluating what we assess in chemistry laboratory work was formulated and tested. Not surprisingly, application of the framework identified a lack of Direct Assessment of Practical Skills (DAPS), but its application can act as a catalyst for faculty to reflect on their assessments of laboratory work and, where necessary, implement in-lab assessments. Based on the Australian Chemistry Threshold Learning Outcomes, the chemistry practical learning outcomes within this framework can be easily aligned with course requirements in other regions (e.g., ACS Guidelines for Undergraduate Chemistry Programs or RSC Accreditation of degree programs), thus providing a universally applicable framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01407
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring We Assess What We Value in Laboratory Work

Andrew J. Seen
3 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Various Chemistry Research Topics
5.26
article

Ensuring We Assess What We Value in Laboratory Work

Andrew J. Seen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Learning how to do chemistry is a valued goal for students undertaking laboratory work in university chemistry degrees; however, in many cases, it is not the student’s laboratory work that is assessed but a report that could just as easily be written using data supplied by the course coordinator. Building on recent work establishing the use of chemistry learning outcomes in course evaluations, a framework for evaluating what we assess in chemistry laboratory work was formulated and tested. Not surprisingly, application of the framework identified a lack of Direct Assessment of Practical Skills (DAPS), but its application can act as a catalyst for faculty to reflect on their assessments of laboratory work and, where necessary, implement in-lab assessments. Based on the Australian Chemistry Threshold Learning Outcomes, the chemistry practical learning outcomes within this framework can be easily aligned with course requirements in other regions (e.g., ACS Guidelines for Undergraduate Chemistry Programs or RSC Accreditation of degree programs), thus providing a universally applicable framework.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 102(5)
University of Tasmania (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.