Parting the fog of war: Assessing military greenhouse gas emissions from below

• The procurement process of militaries, particularly during war time can be complex and secretive, which makes access to data needed to conduct Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) difficult to obtain. • Our framework uses a whole supply chain LCA to measure the carbon emissions from concrete used by the US military during the Iraq war. • Our results show that the combined emissions of T-walls alone used in Iraq came to 54.8 thousand tonnes CO2e, which is equal to 12, 782 gasoline-powered US passenger vehicles driven for one year. • These findings are useful to overcome the secretive nature of military supply chains and calculate carbon emissions and social and environmental impacts during war and occupation. • These calculations point to the urgent need for mandatory military emissions reporting for both war and peacetime through the UN framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC). The world's militaries account for up to 5.5 % of total global greenhouse emissions, yet there is still no requirement for governments to report these emissions in international climate agreements. Researchers are therefore left on their own to assess military emissions. This may seem like an incredibly daunting task. The lack of data is even more stark during periods of conflict, where reporting is relatively non-existent. This article sets out a novel framework for examining greenhouse gas emissions from military supply chains including situations where emissions data are difficult to acquire due to supply chain complexity, or when data are purposefully held back under the guise of national security. We provide an empirical study of supply chain-based carbon from the US military's use of concrete during the Second Iraq War (2003–08) to demonstrate its practicability. Concrete has a massive carbon footprint, and the US military uses a lot of it for protective walls, checkpoints, bases and bunkers. This work provides the tools to measure carbon embodied in military supply chains reinforcing recent calls for standardised frameworks emphasising the accounting of military environmental infrastructure footprints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101654
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parting the fog of war: Assessing military greenhouse gas emissions from below

Kali Rubaii, Kirsti Ashworth, Benjamin Neimark, Reuben Larbi
2 citations
The Extractive Industries and Society
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
article

Parting the fog of war: Assessing military greenhouse gas emissions from below

Kali Rubaii, Kirsti Ashworth, Benjamin Neimark, Reuben Larbi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• The procurement process of militaries, particularly during war time can be complex and secretive, which makes access to data needed to conduct Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) difficult to obtain. • Our framework uses a whole supply chain LCA to measure the carbon emissions from concrete used by the US military during the Iraq war. • Our results show that the combined emissions of T-walls alone used in Iraq came to 54.8 thousand tonnes CO2e, which is equal to 12, 782 gasoline-powered US passenger vehicles driven for one year. • These findings are useful to overcome the secretive nature of military supply chains and calculate carbon emissions and social and environmental impacts during war and occupation. • These calculations point to the urgent need for mandatory military emissions reporting for both war and peacetime through the UN framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC). The world's militaries account for up to 5.5 % of total global greenhouse emissions, yet there is still no requirement for governments to report these emissions in international climate agreements. Researchers are therefore left on their own to assess military emissions. This may seem like an incredibly daunting task. The lack of data is even more stark during periods of conflict, where reporting is relatively non-existent. This article sets out a novel framework for examining greenhouse gas emissions from military supply chains including situations where emissions data are difficult to acquire due to supply chain complexity, or when data are purposefully held back under the guise of national security. We provide an empirical study of supply chain-based carbon from the US military's use of concrete during the Second Iraq War (2003–08) to demonstrate its practicability. Concrete has a massive carbon footprint, and the US military uses a lot of it for protective walls, checkpoints, bases and bunkers. This work provides the tools to measure carbon embodied in military supply chains reinforcing recent calls for standardised frameworks emphasising the accounting of military environmental infrastructure footprints.

The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol. 23
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Lancaster University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Economic and Social Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.