Quantifying Water Control Gelant Injectivity: Gel Time vs. Working Time

Abstract Gel treatments for water control are popular techniques employed in the oilfield industry. One risk of injecting gelant is the premature setting of the gel, which can plug the tubing and require an unplanned workover operation. Gel times are measured in the laboratory by various methods depending on the author and type of gel. The meaning of gel time, as stated by the authors, varies from the point of initial crosslinking to the time available for gel placement and even to the time to achieve a mature gel. With over 500 hits in a search of the OnePetro database using "gel time" as a search parameter, the lack of a formal definition is concerning. A frequently cited method for gel time measurement is to use a steady shear viscometer and capture the time when the viscosity rapidly increases. Studies have shown that the shear involved in the measurement extends the gel time compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements on a quiescent sample. A different method based on injectivity loss through a properly sized filter paper can provide a better estimate of available pumping time into a porous media and potentially prevent premature gelation. This method uses a slightly modified version of the common high-pressure, high-temperature fluid loss apparatus and does not suffer from shear effects, which can alter the gel time measurement. Because it uses porous media, it better mimics the actual injection into reservoir rock. The apparatus and data analysis are fully described in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/224278-ms
Primary Topic
Injection Molding Process and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Water Control Gelant Injectivity: Gel Time vs. Working Time

R Hutchins, D. Alamia, Y. Christanti
SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry
Injection Molding Process and Properties
article

Quantifying Water Control Gelant Injectivity: Gel Time vs. Working Time

R Hutchins, D. Alamia, Y. Christanti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Gel treatments for water control are popular techniques employed in the oilfield industry. One risk of injecting gelant is the premature setting of the gel, which can plug the tubing and require an unplanned workover operation. Gel times are measured in the laboratory by various methods depending on the author and type of gel. The meaning of gel time, as stated by the authors, varies from the point of initial crosslinking to the time available for gel placement and even to the time to achieve a mature gel. With over 500 hits in a search of the OnePetro database using "gel time" as a search parameter, the lack of a formal definition is concerning. A frequently cited method for gel time measurement is to use a steady shear viscometer and capture the time when the viscosity rapidly increases. Studies have shown that the shear involved in the measurement extends the gel time compared to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements on a quiescent sample. A different method based on injectivity loss through a properly sized filter paper can provide a better estimate of available pumping time into a porous media and potentially prevent premature gelation. This method uses a slightly modified version of the common high-pressure, high-temperature fluid loss apparatus and does not suffer from shear effects, which can alter the gel time measurement. Because it uses porous media, it better mimics the actual injection into reservoir rock. The apparatus and data analysis are fully described in this paper.

SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry
Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital (US), Sol-Gel Solutions (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Injection Molding Process and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying Water Control Gelant Injectivity: Gel Time vs. Working Time — R Hutchins, D. Alamia, et al. · SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS