Evaluating retinal image quality for myopia control lenses in a synthetic accommodative wavefront model

This study uses a wavefront model to evaluate the effects of contact lenses on retinal image quality (RIQ) as a function of target vergence (TV). Three hundred synthetic eyes were generated using an accommodative wavefront model to simulate the changes in RIQ with accommodation. The synthetic eyes wavefronts were computationally combined using direct wavefront summation with two myopia control CLs. One has a +2.00D treatment zone dual-focus (DF) design (MiSight), and the other has an extended depth of focus (EDOF) design (Mylo). Peak image quality was calculated for the naked eye, with CLs in the relaxed state, and for an accommodative demand of -2.5D. Additionally, the predicted accommodative response (change in accommodative response that maximizes RIQ) was calculated. The mean RIQ (normalized between 0 and 1) for the relaxed eye was 0.42 ± 0.10 in the naked eye. It decreased to 0.26 ± 0.05 with the DF and threefold to 0.15 ± 0.04 with the EDOF. For a TV = -2.5D, the RIQ was 0.34 ± 0.09 in the naked eye condition, 0.24 ± 0.07 with the DF, and 0.19 ± 0.03 with the EDOF. For the TV, the CL's effective add power, the accommodative RIQ showed a secondary peak, with RIQs of 0.08 ± 0.03 (DF) and 0.12 ± 0.04 (EDOF). The theoretical accommodative response (AR) of the naked eye was 2.33 ± 0.20 D, while with the DF and EDOF, it was 2.23 ± 0.39 D and 1.75 ± 0.22 D, respectively. Both myopia control CLs reduced RIQ at a TV of 0 D. At a TV = -2.5D; both lenses caused a secondary peak in the RIQ through focus. With EDOF, the secondary peak was less than 0.1 D from the maximum peak, likely due to its EDOF design. The theoretical AR was reduced with both myopia control CLs, 0.27 D for DF CLs and 0.75 D for EDOF CLs. These results indicate that both lenses impose significant limitations on RIQ and theoretical AR, align with findings from previous studies on subjective optical performance, and validate the model as a useful testing tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Optics Express
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.549285
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating retinal image quality for myopia control lenses in a synthetic accommodative wavefront model

Paulo Fernandes, Jose Manuel González‐Méijome, María Mechó‐García, Miguel António Faria Ribeiro
Biomedical Optics Express
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Evaluating retinal image quality for myopia control lenses in a synthetic accommodative wavefront model

Paulo Fernandes, Jose Manuel González‐Méijome, María Mechó‐García, Miguel António Faria Ribeiro
article en

Abstract

This study uses a wavefront model to evaluate the effects of contact lenses on retinal image quality (RIQ) as a function of target vergence (TV). Three hundred synthetic eyes were generated using an accommodative wavefront model to simulate the changes in RIQ with accommodation. The synthetic eyes wavefronts were computationally combined using direct wavefront summation with two myopia control CLs. One has a +2.00D treatment zone dual-focus (DF) design (MiSight), and the other has an extended depth of focus (EDOF) design (Mylo). Peak image quality was calculated for the naked eye, with CLs in the relaxed state, and for an accommodative demand of -2.5D. Additionally, the predicted accommodative response (change in accommodative response that maximizes RIQ) was calculated. The mean RIQ (normalized between 0 and 1) for the relaxed eye was 0.42 ± 0.10 in the naked eye. It decreased to 0.26 ± 0.05 with the DF and threefold to 0.15 ± 0.04 with the EDOF. For a TV = -2.5D, the RIQ was 0.34 ± 0.09 in the naked eye condition, 0.24 ± 0.07 with the DF, and 0.19 ± 0.03 with the EDOF. For the TV, the CL's effective add power, the accommodative RIQ showed a secondary peak, with RIQs of 0.08 ± 0.03 (DF) and 0.12 ± 0.04 (EDOF). The theoretical accommodative response (AR) of the naked eye was 2.33 ± 0.20 D, while with the DF and EDOF, it was 2.23 ± 0.39 D and 1.75 ± 0.22 D, respectively. Both myopia control CLs reduced RIQ at a TV of 0 D. At a TV = -2.5D; both lenses caused a secondary peak in the RIQ through focus. With EDOF, the secondary peak was less than 0.1 D from the maximum peak, likely due to its EDOF design. The theoretical AR was reduced with both myopia control CLs, 0.27 D for DF CLs and 0.75 D for EDOF CLs. These results indicate that both lenses impose significant limitations on RIQ and theoretical AR, align with findings from previous studies on subjective optical performance, and validate the model as a useful testing tool.

Biomedical Optics ExpressVol. 17(1)
University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.