Exploring the Impact of Social Networking Sites on Scholarly Communication

Through an altmetric analysis of publications from the top ten LIS journals, this study examines publicationpatterns, mentions across various SNSs, the geographical distribution of user engagement, and the distribution ofAAS for open-access versus closed-access articles. Data were sourced from Altmetric.com through Altmetric Exploreras indexed between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2023, and analysed using MS Excel and SPSS. The studyfound a significant increase in research output and engagement until 2017, followed by a fluctuation and decline insubsequent years. The study also reveals that X (formerly Twitter) is the primary channel for research informationdissemination, with notable contributions from X handles of respective publishers and editors. The study also foundthat the most mentions are associated with the United States (30,791) and the United Kingdom (16,318) among194 countries. Additionally, the analysis shows that open-access and closed-access AAS do not follow a normaldistribution according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Overall findings highlight the importanceof SNSs in shaping academic communication and provide valuable information for researchers and stakeholders toenhance scholarly engagement and dissemination.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.44.6.20279
Primary Topic
Web and Library Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Impact of Social Networking Sites on Scholarly Communication

Mayank Yuvaraj, Manoj Kumar Verma, Bwsrang Basumatary, Nijwm Basumatary
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Web and Library Services
article

Exploring the Impact of Social Networking Sites on Scholarly Communication

Mayank Yuvaraj, Manoj Kumar Verma, Bwsrang Basumatary, Nijwm Basumatary
article en

Abstract

Through an altmetric analysis of publications from the top ten LIS journals, this study examines publicationpatterns, mentions across various SNSs, the geographical distribution of user engagement, and the distribution ofAAS for open-access versus closed-access articles. Data were sourced from Altmetric.com through Altmetric Exploreras indexed between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2023, and analysed using MS Excel and SPSS. The studyfound a significant increase in research output and engagement until 2017, followed by a fluctuation and decline insubsequent years. The study also reveals that X (formerly Twitter) is the primary channel for research informationdissemination, with notable contributions from X handles of respective publishers and editors. The study also foundthat the most mentions are associated with the United States (30,791) and the United Kingdom (16,318) among194 countries. Additionally, the analysis shows that open-access and closed-access AAS do not follow a normaldistribution according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Overall findings highlight the importanceof SNSs in shaping academic communication and provide valuable information for researchers and stakeholders toenhance scholarly engagement and dissemination.

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information TechnologyVol. 44(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Web and Library Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.