Transgender Bodies are the Battleground: Backlash, Threat, and the Future of Queer Rights in the United States

Abstract Legislation that seeks to restrict the ability of transgender people to fully participate in society has proliferated across state legislatures in the last four years. In legislative sessions throughout the United States, legislators have argued in favor of denying transgender people access to public facilities, sports, health care, and even their own guardians. What can these debates tell us not only about the backlash against transgender people but the queer community and women more broadly? Using an analysis of the debate on anti-transgender legislation in two state legislatures, we argue that legislators attempt to gain support for anti-transgender legislation using paternal, protectionist frames and by coopting the language of feminism. We argue that the gender essentialism and heteronormativity at the center of these debates indicates an attempt on behalf of conservative movements and legislators to pursue an idealized, heteropatriarchal society with a strict gender binary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PS Political Science & Politics
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096525000010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgender Bodies are the Battleground: Backlash, Threat, and the Future of Queer Rights in the United States

Amber Lusvardi, Kaitlin Kelly-Thompson
2 citations
PS Political Science & Politics
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
article

Transgender Bodies are the Battleground: Backlash, Threat, and the Future of Queer Rights in the United States

Amber Lusvardi, Kaitlin Kelly-Thompson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Legislation that seeks to restrict the ability of transgender people to fully participate in society has proliferated across state legislatures in the last four years. In legislative sessions throughout the United States, legislators have argued in favor of denying transgender people access to public facilities, sports, health care, and even their own guardians. What can these debates tell us not only about the backlash against transgender people but the queer community and women more broadly? Using an analysis of the debate on anti-transgender legislation in two state legislatures, we argue that legislators attempt to gain support for anti-transgender legislation using paternal, protectionist frames and by coopting the language of feminism. We argue that the gender essentialism and heteronormativity at the center of these debates indicates an attempt on behalf of conservative movements and legislators to pursue an idealized, heteropatriarchal society with a strict gender binary.

PS Political Science & PoliticsVol. 58(3)
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.