Modeling for Competing Risk Regression in Survival Analysis with Application in Breast Cancer Disease

Competing risks regression is an essential component of survival analysis, particularly when there are several possible event types that prevent additional events from being seen. This paper investigates the modelling and analysis of competing risks in time-to-event data. The study was applied to a sample size of (4420) patients with Breast cancer. The data was obtained from Rizgari Hospital in the period from 1st of January 2019 to 31st of August 2024. In survival analysis, a competing risk occurs when an event (such as death from a cause other than breast cancer) precludes the occurrence of the primary event of interest (e.g., breast cancer-specific mortality). The aimf this study is to model the Competing Risk Regression, which treatment effect or risk on our patients which classic survival models such as the Kaplan-Meier estimator may not sufficiently address, in order to assess the likelihood of a particular occurrence in the presence of conflicting hazards. Based on the opinions of the doctors the Age and Family History factors that the risk variable on breast cancer disease, our results show that laterality, family history as a significant predictor in two models ( sub distribution hazard model and cause specific hazard model) age is significant effects in sub distribution hazard and hormone presents as a significant predictor in cause specific hazard model. Furthermore, we compare sub-distribution hazard models with cause-specific hazard models by using AIC and BIC measures so as to determine which model better matches with our data, and we find that the cause-specific hazard models a more reliable match to the data. This study emphasizes how crucial it is to choose the right models for analyzing Competing risks in order to agreement precise predictor and outcomes that are easy to understand, especially in biomedical research. To support practical application, packages that implement competing risks analysis like STATA and NCSS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.4355
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling for Competing Risk Regression in Survival Analysis with Application in Breast Cancer Disease

Kurdistan I. Mawlood Sami Ali Obed
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Modeling for Competing Risk Regression in Survival Analysis with Application in Breast Cancer Disease

Kurdistan I. Mawlood Sami Ali Obed
article en

Abstract

Competing risks regression is an essential component of survival analysis, particularly when there are several possible event types that prevent additional events from being seen. This paper investigates the modelling and analysis of competing risks in time-to-event data. The study was applied to a sample size of (4420) patients with Breast cancer. The data was obtained from Rizgari Hospital in the period from 1st of January 2019 to 31st of August 2024. In survival analysis, a competing risk occurs when an event (such as death from a cause other than breast cancer) precludes the occurrence of the primary event of interest (e.g., breast cancer-specific mortality). The aimf this study is to model the Competing Risk Regression, which treatment effect or risk on our patients which classic survival models such as the Kaplan-Meier estimator may not sufficiently address, in order to assess the likelihood of a particular occurrence in the presence of conflicting hazards. Based on the opinions of the doctors the Age and Family History factors that the risk variable on breast cancer disease, our results show that laterality, family history as a significant predictor in two models ( sub distribution hazard model and cause specific hazard model) age is significant effects in sub distribution hazard and hormone presents as a significant predictor in cause specific hazard model. Furthermore, we compare sub-distribution hazard models with cause-specific hazard models by using AIC and BIC measures so as to determine which model better matches with our data, and we find that the cause-specific hazard models a more reliable match to the data. This study emphasizes how crucial it is to choose the right models for analyzing Competing risks in order to agreement precise predictor and outcomes that are easy to understand, especially in biomedical research. To support practical application, packages that implement competing risks analysis like STATA and NCSS.

Communications on Applied Nonlinear AnalysisVol. 32(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.