“They Just Don’t Want to Feel Forgotten”: A Mixed-Methods Research on Patient Satisfaction With Wait Times in Emergency Departments

Patient satisfaction, an essential care quality measure, is heavily impacted by wait times. This study examined how different factors affect patient satisfaction with ED wait times in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. This mixed-method study, conducted in 4 EDs, used data collected using telephone surveys and semistructured interviews. Patient satisfaction with (1) physician initial assessment and (2) length of stay were analyzed using ordinal regression and thematic analysis. Among the 766 participants, 12% were extremely dissatisfied with physician initial assessment, and 13% were extremely dissatisfied with length of stay. Patients well-informed about the delays were more likely to report higher satisfaction than those who were not informed (aOR = 2.43, 95% CI [1.48-3.99], <i>P</i>-value <.001). Qualitative analysis revealed 4 key themes: poor communication about wait times, lengthy wait times, resource shortages causing long ED wait times, and patients avoiding ED because of it. Our study shows that patients are better satisfied when they are well-informed about the delays. This helped patients feel "less forgotten." Addressing wait time issues is critical to providing patient-centered care and optimizing the care experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Experience
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251333213
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Just Don’t Want to Feel Forgotten”: A Mixed-Methods Research on Patient Satisfaction With Wait Times in Emergency Departments

Dorothy Senior, Anna Walsh, Hensley H. Mariathas, Shabnam Asghari et al.
3 citations
Journal of Patient Experience
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
6.76
article

“They Just Don’t Want to Feel Forgotten”: A Mixed-Methods Research on Patient Satisfaction With Wait Times in Emergency Departments

Dorothy Senior, Anna Walsh, Hensley H. Mariathas, Shabnam Asghari, Oliver Hurley, Holly Etchegary, Paul Norman, Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki, Christopher Patey, Aswathy Geetha Manukumar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Patient satisfaction, an essential care quality measure, is heavily impacted by wait times. This study examined how different factors affect patient satisfaction with ED wait times in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. This mixed-method study, conducted in 4 EDs, used data collected using telephone surveys and semistructured interviews. Patient satisfaction with (1) physician initial assessment and (2) length of stay were analyzed using ordinal regression and thematic analysis. Among the 766 participants, 12% were extremely dissatisfied with physician initial assessment, and 13% were extremely dissatisfied with length of stay. Patients well-informed about the delays were more likely to report higher satisfaction than those who were not informed (aOR = 2.43, 95% CI [1.48-3.99], <i>P</i>-value <.001). Qualitative analysis revealed 4 key themes: poor communication about wait times, lengthy wait times, resource shortages causing long ED wait times, and patients avoiding ED because of it. Our study shows that patients are better satisfied when they are well-informed about the delays. This helped patients feel "less forgotten." Addressing wait time issues is critical to providing patient-centered care and optimizing the care experience.

Journal of Patient ExperienceVol. 12
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
6.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.