Plutopopulism: Wealth and Trump’s Financial Base

Comparative scholarship suggests authoritarian candidates often rely on backing from the wealthy. The wealthy are also said to play an important role in American campaign finance. Studies of Donald Trump, however, found that he drew significant support from white Americans with less education and privilege. We evaluate wealthy and non-wealthy Americans’ financial support for Trump, compared to other candidates, by constructing a comprehensive dataset of property values matched to contributions and voter files. We find Trump underperformed among wealthy Republican donors while mobilizing new non-wealthy donors. Trump also diversified the donorate, especially by education. That is, Trump built an unusual coalition of wealthy and non-wealthy donors. Our results support an alternative, “plutopopulist” model of Trump’s financial base. This study demonstrates the importance of studying both non-wealthy and wealthy Americans, the group who give the most but whose individual behavior has been studied the least.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055425000061
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plutopopulism: Wealth and Trump’s Financial Base

Sean Kates, Tali Mendelberg, Omar Wasow, Eric G. Manning
2 citations
American Political Science Review
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
article

Plutopopulism: Wealth and Trump’s Financial Base

Sean Kates, Tali Mendelberg, Omar Wasow, Eric G. Manning
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Comparative scholarship suggests authoritarian candidates often rely on backing from the wealthy. The wealthy are also said to play an important role in American campaign finance. Studies of Donald Trump, however, found that he drew significant support from white Americans with less education and privilege. We evaluate wealthy and non-wealthy Americans’ financial support for Trump, compared to other candidates, by constructing a comprehensive dataset of property values matched to contributions and voter files. We find Trump underperformed among wealthy Republican donors while mobilizing new non-wealthy donors. Trump also diversified the donorate, especially by education. That is, Trump built an unusual coalition of wealthy and non-wealthy donors. Our results support an alternative, “plutopopulist” model of Trump’s financial base. This study demonstrates the importance of studying both non-wealthy and wealthy Americans, the group who give the most but whose individual behavior has been studied the least.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 120(1)
Princeton University (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Plutopopulism: Wealth and Trump’s Financial Base — Sean Kates, Tali Mendelberg, et al. · American Political Science Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS