Real-Life Performance of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems for High-Carbohydrate Meals: Are All Systems the Same?

Managing postprandial blood glucose levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes remains challenging, particularly with high-carbohydrate meals. This study analyzed postprandial glycemic responses to Margherita pizza and a ham sandwich with similar macronutrient content in children using two different automated insulin delivery (AID) systems: MiniMed™ 780G and Tandem t:slim X2™ with Control-IQ. Thirty-four participants consumed both meals on separate occasions while maintaining standard insulin boluses. Results showed no significant differences in glycemic control between meals, suggesting that Margherita pizza can be effectively managed with standard bolus strategies. However, individuals using MiniMed 780G demonstrated a higher time in target range (70-140 mg/dL) in the 10 h following pizza consumption compared with Control-IQ users, possibly due to MiniMed 780G's multiple automatic correction boluses. No other significant differences in glucometrics or insulin delivery were observed. These findings highlight the need for personalized meal management strategies based on specific AID system algorithms. <b>Study registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05729776.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0106
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-Life Performance of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems for High-Carbohydrate Meals: Are All Systems the Same?

Andrea Scaramuzza, Gülsüm Özen, Assunta Serena Rollato, Emanuele Miraglia del Giudice et al.
2 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
2.59
article

Real-Life Performance of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems for High-Carbohydrate Meals: Are All Systems the Same?

Andrea Scaramuzza, Gülsüm Özen, Assunta Serena Rollato, Emanuele Miraglia del Giudice, Dario Iafusco, Angela Zanfardino, Giuseppe Ippolito, Alfonso Galderisi, Veronica Testa, Antonietta Chianese
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Managing postprandial blood glucose levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes remains challenging, particularly with high-carbohydrate meals. This study analyzed postprandial glycemic responses to Margherita pizza and a ham sandwich with similar macronutrient content in children using two different automated insulin delivery (AID) systems: MiniMed™ 780G and Tandem t:slim X2™ with Control-IQ. Thirty-four participants consumed both meals on separate occasions while maintaining standard insulin boluses. Results showed no significant differences in glycemic control between meals, suggesting that Margherita pizza can be effectively managed with standard bolus strategies. However, individuals using MiniMed 780G demonstrated a higher time in target range (70-140 mg/dL) in the 10 h following pizza consumption compared with Control-IQ users, possibly due to MiniMed 780G's multiple automatic correction boluses. No other significant differences in glucometrics or insulin delivery were observed. These findings highlight the need for personalized meal management strategies based on specific AID system algorithms. <b>Study registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05729776.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(8)
Ankara University (TR), Regione Campania (IT), Yale University (US), Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Research
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.