Access, Supports, and Performance in Dual Enrollment: A COVID-19 Case’s Implications for Equity

Dual enrollment (DE) courses are a prominent strategy for promoting college access and success, but racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in participation remain stark. DE programs that broaden access may need to deploy strategies that provide targeted support and interventions to specific populations of students. However, whether DE programmatic elements are conducive to equity is unknown. In this study, we analyzed trends in student performance before COVID-19 and in COVID-19-impacted years in a hybrid DE program that made programmatic changes during the pandemic. We found that student performance in these DE courses improved during the pandemic, suggesting that modifications the program made may have benefited student performance overall, but racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities also widened during this time. These results suggest the need for future research and reform on equitable interventions and support in broad-access DE courses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251327161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access, Supports, and Performance in Dual Enrollment: A COVID-19 Case’s Implications for Equity

J. Porter, Matt Giani, Shruti Khandekar
1 citations
AERA Open
Disability Education and Employment
2.37
article

Access, Supports, and Performance in Dual Enrollment: A COVID-19 Case’s Implications for Equity

J. Porter, Matt Giani, Shruti Khandekar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dual enrollment (DE) courses are a prominent strategy for promoting college access and success, but racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in participation remain stark. DE programs that broaden access may need to deploy strategies that provide targeted support and interventions to specific populations of students. However, whether DE programmatic elements are conducive to equity is unknown. In this study, we analyzed trends in student performance before COVID-19 and in COVID-19-impacted years in a hybrid DE program that made programmatic changes during the pandemic. We found that student performance in these DE courses improved during the pandemic, suggesting that modifications the program made may have benefited student performance overall, but racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities also widened during this time. These results suggest the need for future research and reform on equitable interventions and support in broad-access DE courses.

AERA OpenVol. 11
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Disability Education and Employment
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Access, Supports, and Performance in Dual Enrollment: A COVID-19 Case’s Implications for Equity — J. Porter, Matt Giani, et al. · AERA Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS