Perspectives on Obesity Management and the Use of Anti-Obesity Medicine from US Employees and Employers: Results from the OBSERVE Study

Personal health factors and direct and indirect costs of obesity affect employers and employees. This research aimed to understand perceptions of obesity management and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) among employers and employees. In 2022, people with obesity and employers completed cross-sectional surveys about perceptions of obesity and its management, including AOMs. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Data from 461 employed people with obesity (EwO) and 51 employer representatives (ER) were analyzed. Both EwO and ER acknowledged the impact of obesity on future health problems (88.3%; 100.0%) and perceived obesity as a disease (60.5%; 80.4%) to varied degrees. Both groups perceived an incremental value in combining self-directed lifestyle changes and AOMs (57.5%; 66.7%) and perceived healthcare provider-guided lifestyle change alongside AOMs as the most effective approach for maintaining long-term weight reduction (56.4%; 66.6%). More than two-thirds (68.6%) of ER expressed willingness to revisit their AOM coverage decisions, though cost of medication coverage (72.5%) and affordability of medications for employees (68.7%) were identified as barriers. ER believed that data showing reductions in premiums and claims at their organizations (78.4%) would be helpful in supporting the coverage of AOMs. While EwO and ER were receptive toward AOMs, organization-level barriers existed with AOM coverage. Evidence demonstrating the benefits of evidence-based obesity care, direct/indirect cost reductions, and the impact of obesity may address barriers to AOM coverage and improve obesity care and outcomes of their workforces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Health Management
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0239
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Obesity Management and the Use of Anti-Obesity Medicine from US Employees and Employers: Results from the OBSERVE Study

Sheila Drakeley, Kristen King-Concialdi, Rekha B. Kumar, Kimberly A. Gudzune et al.
2 citations
Population Health Management
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
2.79
article

Perspectives on Obesity Management and the Use of Anti-Obesity Medicine from US Employees and Employers: Results from the OBSERVE Study

Sheila Drakeley, Kristen King-Concialdi, Rekha B. Kumar, Kimberly A. Gudzune, Tracy J. Sims, H. Kan, Lee M. Kaplan, Julia P. Dunn, Jamy D. Ard, Nadia N. Ahmad, Scott Kahan, Adam Jauregui
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Personal health factors and direct and indirect costs of obesity affect employers and employees. This research aimed to understand perceptions of obesity management and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) among employers and employees. In 2022, people with obesity and employers completed cross-sectional surveys about perceptions of obesity and its management, including AOMs. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Data from 461 employed people with obesity (EwO) and 51 employer representatives (ER) were analyzed. Both EwO and ER acknowledged the impact of obesity on future health problems (88.3%; 100.0%) and perceived obesity as a disease (60.5%; 80.4%) to varied degrees. Both groups perceived an incremental value in combining self-directed lifestyle changes and AOMs (57.5%; 66.7%) and perceived healthcare provider-guided lifestyle change alongside AOMs as the most effective approach for maintaining long-term weight reduction (56.4%; 66.6%). More than two-thirds (68.6%) of ER expressed willingness to revisit their AOM coverage decisions, though cost of medication coverage (72.5%) and affordability of medications for employees (68.7%) were identified as barriers. ER believed that data showing reductions in premiums and claims at their organizations (78.4%) would be helpful in supporting the coverage of AOMs. While EwO and ER were receptive toward AOMs, organization-level barriers existed with AOM coverage. Evidence demonstrating the benefits of evidence-based obesity care, direct/indirect cost reductions, and the impact of obesity may address barriers to AOM coverage and improve obesity care and outcomes of their workforces.

Population Health ManagementVol. 28(3)
Oracle (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), George Washington University (US), Cornell University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.