Modelling nitrogen translocation to grain under elevated carbon dioxide in wheat
• Grain N yield response to CO2 was 33 % under water stress, low (1 %) under low N-supply. • Results show decline in grain N concentration under eCO2 despite increased N supply. • Models’ accuracy was similar to the experimental error for harvest grain N yield. • Models did not predict well observed post-anthesis decline in grain N concentration. • Models need better post-anthesis dynamics to capture the flux of N into grain. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration tends to increase grain yields and decreases grain N concentration in cereal crops, reducing nutritional content. The robustness of APSIM-Wheat, DSSAT-Nwheat and OLEARY-CONNOR models were tested for their performance in predicting grain N yield and grain N concentration under elevated CO2 (eCO2) across two environments with varied environmental stresses including temperature, in-season water, and N supply. Observed grain N yield response to eCO2 was 33 % increase under water stressed conditions but low (1 %) under low N-supply conditions. Models’ responses to eCO2 were similar and close to the experimental error for harvest grain N yield and N concentration, but with large error in stressed environments. The biomass N concentration by anthesis and grain N concentration during post anthesis were not well simulated by the models in all conditions. While each model showed some advantage in some treatments, all models need better post-anthesis N dynamics to capture the flux of N into grain. The models would benefit from improvements in the following: potential excess soil N availability, initial and early flux of N to grain, heat and water stress interactions with eCO2, soil N dynamics in wet conditions. Specifically, for APSIM-Wheat mechanisms that increase grain N concentration decline post anthesis, for DSSAT-Nwheat mechanisms that decrease grain N concentration decline early after anthesis and for OLEARY-CONNOR model reinstating the original multilayer soil profile for both water and N balances. All these results point to the need for a specialised modelling framework for cereal nitrogen dynamics after anthesis.
Authors
- Cassandra Kiely Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-706X)
- Senthold Asseng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-3811)
- Faith Githui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-5488)
- Thabo Thayalakumaran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4517-7435)
- James G. Nuttall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-0041)
- Garry J. O’Leary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2110-6471)
- Kirsten Barlow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1352-5864)
- Glenn J. Fitzgerald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-4443)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Next research.
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100307
- Primary Topic
- Plant responses to elevated CO2
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Grains Research and Development Corporation
- University of Melbourne
- Department of Agriculture, Australian Government