Impact of outlets manifold configuration on hydraulic stability and water hammer in pumping stations

• Bentley HAMMER software was used to model the transient behavior under different manifold designs. • The manifold placement affects how the water hammer develops and how much pressure transients surge. According to asymmetric flow paths and intensified momentum shifts, the left manifold configuration produced pressure spikes reaching 1350 kPa, compared to the middle. • Surge tanks reduced water hammer effects and improved main pipeline maximum pressures by 25 %. • Engineers and designers can optimize pumping station design through findings that help minimize water hammer risk occurrences. This study presents a new approach to studying the effects of asymmetric outlet manifold influence on hydraulic stability and water hammer dynamics in the pumping station of the Great Al-Samawah Water Project. The researchers executed transient flow analyses with Bentley HAMMER V8i on four different designs, which included the middle and left-side manifolds, both with and without surge tanks. Results revealed that manifold positioning critically affects pressure surges. The left-side configuration (Case 2C) generated higher peak pressures (1350 kPa) compared to the middle layout (Case 1A, 1329 kPa) due to asymmetric flow paths. Surge tanks reduced maximum pressures by 25 % (Case 1B) and 21 % (Case 2D) relative to unprotected systems. However, the left-side manifold with a surge tank (Case 2D) exhibited higher residual pressures (2750 kPa) than the middle counterpart (2300 kPa), emphasizing the influence of manifold geometry on surge tank effectiveness. An optimal manifold design that maintains symmetry and carefully planned surge tank positions is critical to minimizing risk factors from water hammer occurrences and boosting hydraulic system integrity. The research delivers practical design instructions to engineers that optimize infrastructure resilience by combining configuration enhancements with surge tank integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104747
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of outlets manifold configuration on hydraulic stability and water hammer in pumping stations

Layth Abdulameer, Ahmed N. Al-Dujaili, Khalid Shemal, Najah M. L. Al Maimuri et al.
4 citations
Results in Engineering
Water Systems and Optimization
3.81
article

Impact of outlets manifold configuration on hydraulic stability and water hammer in pumping stations

Layth Abdulameer, Ahmed N. Al-Dujaili, Khalid Shemal, Najah M. L. Al Maimuri, Muhammed Salah Sadiq Al-Kafaji
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Bentley HAMMER software was used to model the transient behavior under different manifold designs. • The manifold placement affects how the water hammer develops and how much pressure transients surge. According to asymmetric flow paths and intensified momentum shifts, the left manifold configuration produced pressure spikes reaching 1350 kPa, compared to the middle. • Surge tanks reduced water hammer effects and improved main pipeline maximum pressures by 25 %. • Engineers and designers can optimize pumping station design through findings that help minimize water hammer risk occurrences. This study presents a new approach to studying the effects of asymmetric outlet manifold influence on hydraulic stability and water hammer dynamics in the pumping station of the Great Al-Samawah Water Project. The researchers executed transient flow analyses with Bentley HAMMER V8i on four different designs, which included the middle and left-side manifolds, both with and without surge tanks. Results revealed that manifold positioning critically affects pressure surges. The left-side configuration (Case 2C) generated higher peak pressures (1350 kPa) compared to the middle layout (Case 1A, 1329 kPa) due to asymmetric flow paths. Surge tanks reduced maximum pressures by 25 % (Case 1B) and 21 % (Case 2D) relative to unprotected systems. However, the left-side manifold with a surge tank (Case 2D) exhibited higher residual pressures (2750 kPa) than the middle counterpart (2300 kPa), emphasizing the influence of manifold geometry on surge tank effectiveness. An optimal manifold design that maintains symmetry and carefully planned surge tank positions is critical to minimizing risk factors from water hammer occurrences and boosting hydraulic system integrity. The research delivers practical design instructions to engineers that optimize infrastructure resilience by combining configuration enhancements with surge tank integration.

Results in EngineeringVol. 26
University of Baghdad (IQ), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (EG), University of Kerbala (IQ)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Water Systems and Optimization
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.