Detection of Outlying Correlation Coefficients in Multicenter Clinical Trials

Central statistical monitoring aims at finding centers whose data distribution differs significantly from the other centers in multicentric clinical trials. Such differences may point to data quality issues due to negligence, misconduct, or fraud. Data distributions can be compared across centers in many different ways, depending on the type of data (e.g., numerical or categorical), whether a univariate or a multivariate comparison is performed, and so on. In that framework, we present two methods aimed at detecting centers with outlying bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. One of the methods directly compares the correlations across centers. The other method conditions the test on one of the marginal standard deviations, which makes the test on correlation independent of the centers' standard deviations. Both methods are shown to perform equally well on simulated data. They are also applied on real world data, where they identify centers with outlying correlations. The findings of the two tests are compared, showing that they concord for centers with average standard deviations, but differ for centers with extreme standard deviations. While the focus here is on central statistical monitoring, the methods are general and can be used in other settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70013
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of Outlying Correlation Coefficients in Multicenter Clinical Trials

David Venet, Laura Trotta, Lieven Desmet, Tomasz Burzykowski et al.
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Detection of Outlying Correlation Coefficients in Multicenter Clinical Trials

David Venet, Laura Trotta, Lieven Desmet, Tomasz Burzykowski, Marc E Buyse
article en

Abstract

Central statistical monitoring aims at finding centers whose data distribution differs significantly from the other centers in multicentric clinical trials. Such differences may point to data quality issues due to negligence, misconduct, or fraud. Data distributions can be compared across centers in many different ways, depending on the type of data (e.g., numerical or categorical), whether a univariate or a multivariate comparison is performed, and so on. In that framework, we present two methods aimed at detecting centers with outlying bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. One of the methods directly compares the correlations across centers. The other method conditions the test on one of the marginal standard deviations, which makes the test on correlation independent of the centers' standard deviations. Both methods are shown to perform equally well on simulated data. They are also applied on real world data, where they identify centers with outlying correlations. The findings of the two tests are compared, showing that they concord for centers with average standard deviations, but differ for centers with extreme standard deviations. While the focus here is on central statistical monitoring, the methods are general and can be used in other settings.

Pharmaceutical StatisticsVol. 24(3)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Medical University of Białystok (PL), Institut Jules Bordet (BE), International Drug Development Institute (Belgium) (BE), Hasselt University (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.