Beyond Co-Design Idealism: A Conceptual Framework for Participatory UX in Development Contexts

Participatory design is widely embraced in development and humanitarian contexts as a pathway to inclusion and empowerment. Yet in practice, participatory UX is often constrained by institutional timelines, cultural misalignments, and symbolic implementation. This conceptual paper critically examines co-design idealism and reframes participation as a negotiated, relational, and context-dependent process. Through a synthesis of interdisciplinary literature, it identifies five recurring tensions that limit participatory UX: (1) ethical and emotional labor in facilitation, (2) structural constraints and donor priorities, (3) epistemological divergence, (4) power and positionality, and (5) symbolic versus substantive participation. Drawing on critical UX, postcolonial HCI, and design justice, the paper offers a reflective framework for more ethically grounded and situated practice. Rather than proposing universal solutions, it invites UX practitioners and researchers to move beyond checkbox participation—toward culturally resonant, reciprocal, and impact-driven engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Userhub Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58947/journal.xdjm89
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Co-Design Idealism: A Conceptual Framework for Participatory UX in Development Contexts

Wahid bin Ahsan
2 citations
Userhub Journal
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
article

Beyond Co-Design Idealism: A Conceptual Framework for Participatory UX in Development Contexts

Wahid bin Ahsan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Participatory design is widely embraced in development and humanitarian contexts as a pathway to inclusion and empowerment. Yet in practice, participatory UX is often constrained by institutional timelines, cultural misalignments, and symbolic implementation. This conceptual paper critically examines co-design idealism and reframes participation as a negotiated, relational, and context-dependent process. Through a synthesis of interdisciplinary literature, it identifies five recurring tensions that limit participatory UX: (1) ethical and emotional labor in facilitation, (2) structural constraints and donor priorities, (3) epistemological divergence, (4) power and positionality, and (5) symbolic versus substantive participation. Drawing on critical UX, postcolonial HCI, and design justice, the paper offers a reflective framework for more ethically grounded and situated practice. Rather than proposing universal solutions, it invites UX practitioners and researchers to move beyond checkbox participation—toward culturally resonant, reciprocal, and impact-driven engagement.

Userhub Journal
NEWhub (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.