Is it Reasonable to Implement Barrier Function Adaptation Under Sensor Noise?

This article studies the behavior of barrier function adaptation (BFA) in the presence of bounded deterministic noises with the known upper bound, both theoretically and experimentally. It is shown that, in the case of discontinuous noises, the predefined performance of the output can be lost. Nevertheless, if the barrier function width (BFW) is selected in accordance to the upper bound of the perturbation, the prescribed performance of the output can be asserted. In the case of continuous noises, BFW needs to be selected at least twice as big as the bound of the measurement noise, i.e., the knowledge of the upper bound of the perturbations is not needed, and the predefined performance of the output is ensured. In the case of Lipschitz continuous noises, BFW can be selected arbitrary, and the system output will be kept in BFW. An experimental study, considering different classes of noises, is designed and implemented on a brushed dc motor to illustrate the conclusions drawn from the theoretical analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2025.3549347
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it Reasonable to Implement Barrier Function Adaptation Under Sensor Noise?

Leonid Fridman, Luis Ovalle, Andrés González
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Is it Reasonable to Implement Barrier Function Adaptation Under Sensor Noise?

Leonid Fridman, Luis Ovalle, Andrés González
article en

Abstract

This article studies the behavior of barrier function adaptation (BFA) in the presence of bounded deterministic noises with the known upper bound, both theoretically and experimentally. It is shown that, in the case of discontinuous noises, the predefined performance of the output can be lost. Nevertheless, if the barrier function width (BFW) is selected in accordance to the upper bound of the perturbation, the prescribed performance of the output can be asserted. In the case of continuous noises, BFW needs to be selected at least twice as big as the bound of the measurement noise, i.e., the knowledge of the upper bound of the perturbations is not needed, and the predefined performance of the output is ensured. In the case of Lipschitz continuous noises, BFW can be selected arbitrary, and the system output will be kept in BFW. An experimental study, considering different classes of noises, is designed and implemented on a brushed dc motor to illustrate the conclusions drawn from the theoretical analysis.

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologyVol. 33(5)
Durango Institute of Technology (MX), Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.