Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games

In this paper, we study best responses in repeated additive games among two players. A stage game is additive if each player’s payoff is the sum of two components, and each component only depends on the action of a single player. We suppose one player’s strategy depends on the co-player’s last n actions. Then we prove that the other player has a best response that only depends on their own n − 1 actions. That is, for an important sub-class of games and strategies, players can achieve maximum payoffs even with less memory than their opponent. • We study repeated additive games among two players with finite memory (finite recall). • Suppose one player reacts to the opponent’s actions during the last n rounds. • We prove the opponent has a best response that only depends on the last n-1 rounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112300
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games

Nikoleta E. Glynatsi, Christian Hilbe, Franziska Lesigang
2 citations
Economics Letters
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
8.40
article

Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games

Nikoleta E. Glynatsi, Christian Hilbe, Franziska Lesigang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we study best responses in repeated additive games among two players. A stage game is additive if each player’s payoff is the sum of two components, and each component only depends on the action of a single player. We suppose one player’s strategy depends on the co-player’s last n actions. Then we prove that the other player has a best response that only depends on their own n − 1 actions. That is, for an important sub-class of games and strategies, players can achieve maximum payoffs even with less memory than their opponent. • We study repeated additive games among two players with finite memory (finite recall). • Suppose one player reacts to the opponent’s actions during the last n rounds. • We prove the opponent has a best response that only depends on the last n-1 rounds.

Economics LettersVol. 250
TU Wien (AT), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP), Linz Center of Mechatronics (Austria) (AT), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can I afford to remember less than you? Best responses in repeated additive games — Nikoleta E. Glynatsi, Christian Hilbe, et al. · Economics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS