Linking micro‐X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy and X‐ray computed tomography with model simulation explains differences in nutrient gradients around roots of different types and ages

Plant roots create chemical gradients within the rhizosphere, but little information exists on the effect of root properties on the distribution of chemical gradients. The research aim was to analyse and model the effects of root type and age, radial root geometry and root hairs on nutrient gradients in the rhizosphere. Using micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (μ-XRF) combined with X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), we analysed nutrient gradients around root segments with different diameters and ages of two Zea mays genotypes (wild-type and root hair defective mutant) growing in two substrates (loam and sand). Gradients of key nutrients were compared with gradients obtained by a process-based, radially symmetric 1D rhizosphere model. Results show that root hairs matter for nutrient uptake during supply limitation (phosphorus (P)), but not when it is limited by uptake kinetics (calcium (Ca), sulphur (S)). Higher Ca and S accumulation was observed at the surface of older and thicker root segments than at younger and thinner root segments. Micro-XRF proved suitable for the detection of nutrient gradients of Ca and S, but not of P. While continuum modelling was well suited to explain observed nutrient gradients, it was less effective in representing pore-related phenomena, such as precipitation reactions, which calls for new homogenization approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70102
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking micro‐X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy and X‐ray computed tomography with model simulation explains differences in nutrient gradients around roots of different types and ages

Magdalena Landl, Rüdiger Kilian, Andrea Schnepf, Eric Braatz et al.
5 citations
New Phytologist
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
8.75
article

Linking micro‐X‐ray fluorescence spectroscopy and X‐ray computed tomography with model simulation explains differences in nutrient gradients around roots of different types and ages

Magdalena Landl, Rüdiger Kilian, Andrea Schnepf, Eric Braatz, Doris Vetterlein, Steffen Schlüter, Robert Mikutta, Eva Lippold
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Plant roots create chemical gradients within the rhizosphere, but little information exists on the effect of root properties on the distribution of chemical gradients. The research aim was to analyse and model the effects of root type and age, radial root geometry and root hairs on nutrient gradients in the rhizosphere. Using micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (μ-XRF) combined with X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), we analysed nutrient gradients around root segments with different diameters and ages of two Zea mays genotypes (wild-type and root hair defective mutant) growing in two substrates (loam and sand). Gradients of key nutrients were compared with gradients obtained by a process-based, radially symmetric 1D rhizosphere model. Results show that root hairs matter for nutrient uptake during supply limitation (phosphorus (P)), but not when it is limited by uptake kinetics (calcium (Ca), sulphur (S)). Higher Ca and S accumulation was observed at the surface of older and thicker root segments than at younger and thinner root segments. Micro-XRF proved suitable for the detection of nutrient gradients of Ca and S, but not of P. While continuum modelling was well suited to explain observed nutrient gradients, it was less effective in representing pore-related phenomena, such as precipitation reactions, which calls for new homogenization approaches.

New PhytologistVol. 246(4)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
8.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.