Systems‐Level Consultation to Improve Intervention Fidelity and Student Outcomes: A Collective Case Study of a Blended Learning Reading Program

ABSTRACT School psychologists have the potential to improve students' reading skills by helping schools select evidence‐based programs and then supporting their implementation. Blended learning offers a flexible implementation format to address long‐standing challenges implementing and scaling reading programs in schools. The purpose of this study was to explore the unique implementation challenges associated with blended learning programs, how systems‐level consultation can be used to support implementation and foster intervention fidelity, and the extent to which intervention fidelity of a blended learning reading program was associated with student reading skills. This collective case study included qualitative and quantitative data from 20 schools, 666 educators, and 6208 students in the U.S. We employed mixed methods, which included inductive thematic analysis of 47 implementation plans and means difference testing to examine differences in educator engagement, student‐level intervention fidelity, and student outcomes across districts with varying levels of implementation supports. Results identified several challenges encountered throughout implementation and the types of strategies employed to address those challenges. Further, results suggested that there were greater levels of fidelity and more positive student outcomes in schools accessing systems‐level consultation to support implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23490
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systems‐Level Consultation to Improve Intervention Fidelity and Student Outcomes: A Collective Case Study of a Blended Learning Reading Program

Cara Marcinek Bliss, Courtenay A. Barrett
Psychology in the Schools
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Systems‐Level Consultation to Improve Intervention Fidelity and Student Outcomes: A Collective Case Study of a Blended Learning Reading Program

Cara Marcinek Bliss, Courtenay A. Barrett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT School psychologists have the potential to improve students' reading skills by helping schools select evidence‐based programs and then supporting their implementation. Blended learning offers a flexible implementation format to address long‐standing challenges implementing and scaling reading programs in schools. The purpose of this study was to explore the unique implementation challenges associated with blended learning programs, how systems‐level consultation can be used to support implementation and foster intervention fidelity, and the extent to which intervention fidelity of a blended learning reading program was associated with student reading skills. This collective case study included qualitative and quantitative data from 20 schools, 666 educators, and 6208 students in the U.S. We employed mixed methods, which included inductive thematic analysis of 47 implementation plans and means difference testing to examine differences in educator engagement, student‐level intervention fidelity, and student outcomes across districts with varying levels of implementation supports. Results identified several challenges encountered throughout implementation and the types of strategies employed to address those challenges. Further, results suggested that there were greater levels of fidelity and more positive student outcomes in schools accessing systems‐level consultation to support implementation.

Psychology in the SchoolsVol. 62(8)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.