Real ethics has dirty feet – data collector perspectives on risk exposure during data collection in conflict-affected Eastern DRC

Even when fully implementing international ethical guidelines, some risks in humanitarian crisis settings cannot be entirely foreseen or avoided. Local data supervisors and data collectors recognize these risks and take partial ownership in managing them as active agents and contributors to the research. In this sense, real ethics has dirty feet: Data collection in such settings cannot be entirely risk-free; but it still might be important to do the research. The decision to accept such risks however should not solely be made by external researchers who follow international ethical guidelines. It should also be informed by the local data collectors and supervisors who understand the risks within context and culture; and include their judgment on whether the research effort is worth doing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict and Health
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00658-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real ethics has dirty feet – data collector perspectives on risk exposure during data collection in conflict-affected Eastern DRC

Jean Mutabaruka, Henny Slegh, Eugène Rutembesa, Bonaventure Mihigo et al.
2 citations
Conflict and Health
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
article

Real ethics has dirty feet – data collector perspectives on risk exposure during data collection in conflict-affected Eastern DRC

Jean Mutabaruka, Henny Slegh, Eugène Rutembesa, Bonaventure Mihigo, Epaphrodite Nsabimana, Japhet Niyonsenga, Mediatrice Kagaba, Stefan Jansen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Even when fully implementing international ethical guidelines, some risks in humanitarian crisis settings cannot be entirely foreseen or avoided. Local data supervisors and data collectors recognize these risks and take partial ownership in managing them as active agents and contributors to the research. In this sense, real ethics has dirty feet: Data collection in such settings cannot be entirely risk-free; but it still might be important to do the research. The decision to accept such risks however should not solely be made by external researchers who follow international ethical guidelines. It should also be informed by the local data collectors and supervisors who understand the risks within context and culture; and include their judgment on whether the research effort is worth doing.

Conflict and HealthVol. 19(1)
University of Parma (IT), University of Kigali (RW), University of Rwanda (RW), University of Global Health Equity (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real ethics has dirty feet – data collector perspectives on risk exposure during data collection in conflict-affected Eastern DRC — Jean Mutabaruka, Henny Slegh, et al. · Conflict and Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS