Genetic diversity of Gymnocypris firmispinatus: Insights from microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA among wild, broodstock source, and broodstock populations

This study provides an analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure of Gymnocypris firmispinatus , a fish species endemic to the upper Yangtze River. Genetic evaluations were conducted using both microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers across three distinct populations: wild, broodstock source, and broodstock. The results show that genetic diversity is relatively uniform across these groups, with no significant differences observed in diversity levels. The wild population had an average of 15.889 alleles per locus, the broodstock source population had an average of 16.444 alleles per locus, and the broodstock population had an average of 13.778 alleles per locus, with an average polymorphic information content ( PIC ) of 0.883. The observed heterozygosity ( H o ) and expected heterozygosity ( H e ) averaged 0.729 and 0.894, respectively. mtDNA (5’-Cyt b + D-loop-3’) analysis revealed 36 haplotypes with an overall haplotype diversity ( h ) of 0.901 and an overall nucleotide diversity ( π ) of 0.00476. Genetic differentiation was significant, particularly between the wild and broodstock populations, as indicated by high F st values for both microsatellite and mtDNA markers. The broodstock population presented a high level of diversity with microsatellite markers ( H o = 0.737, H e = 0.798, PIC = 0.769), whereas mtDNA markers presented comparatively lower diversity ( h = 0.563, π = 0.00079). This contrast highlights the importance of using both marker types to gain a complete understanding of the genetic structure of populations. The reduced mtDNA diversity is likely due to its smaller effective population size and greater susceptibility to genetic drift, given its maternal inheritance. These findings suggest that stock enhancement release activities can help preserve the genetic diversity of the G. firmispinatus population. • Microsatellite and mtDNA markers have shown uniform genetic diversity across populations. • High genetic differentiation has been observed between wild and broodstock populations. • Stock enhancement activities haven't reduced genetic diversity significantly. • Both microsatellite and mtDNA markers are essential for understanding population genetic structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture Reports
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.102767
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic diversity of Gymnocypris firmispinatus: Insights from microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA among wild, broodstock source, and broodstock populations

Pengzhi Qi, Peng Liang, Haifeng Tian, Liqiao Zhong et al.
Aquaculture Reports
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Genetic diversity of Gymnocypris firmispinatus: Insights from microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA among wild, broodstock source, and broodstock populations

Pengzhi Qi, Peng Liang, Haifeng Tian, Liqiao Zhong, Baoshan Ma, Xiaodong Wang, Hong He
article en

Abstract

This study provides an analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure of Gymnocypris firmispinatus , a fish species endemic to the upper Yangtze River. Genetic evaluations were conducted using both microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers across three distinct populations: wild, broodstock source, and broodstock. The results show that genetic diversity is relatively uniform across these groups, with no significant differences observed in diversity levels. The wild population had an average of 15.889 alleles per locus, the broodstock source population had an average of 16.444 alleles per locus, and the broodstock population had an average of 13.778 alleles per locus, with an average polymorphic information content ( PIC ) of 0.883. The observed heterozygosity ( H o ) and expected heterozygosity ( H e ) averaged 0.729 and 0.894, respectively. mtDNA (5’-Cyt b + D-loop-3’) analysis revealed 36 haplotypes with an overall haplotype diversity ( h ) of 0.901 and an overall nucleotide diversity ( π ) of 0.00476. Genetic differentiation was significant, particularly between the wild and broodstock populations, as indicated by high F st values for both microsatellite and mtDNA markers. The broodstock population presented a high level of diversity with microsatellite markers ( H o = 0.737, H e = 0.798, PIC = 0.769), whereas mtDNA markers presented comparatively lower diversity ( h = 0.563, π = 0.00079). This contrast highlights the importance of using both marker types to gain a complete understanding of the genetic structure of populations. The reduced mtDNA diversity is likely due to its smaller effective population size and greater susceptibility to genetic drift, given its maternal inheritance. These findings suggest that stock enhancement release activities can help preserve the genetic diversity of the G. firmispinatus population. • Microsatellite and mtDNA markers have shown uniform genetic diversity across populations. • High genetic differentiation has been observed between wild and broodstock populations. • Stock enhancement activities haven't reduced genetic diversity significantly. • Both microsatellite and mtDNA markers are essential for understanding population genetic structure.

Aquaculture ReportsVol. 42
Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), Yibin University (CN), Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.